Efficacy of digitalized comprehensive educational program for patients with allergic contact dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial

Authors

  • Wongsiya Viarasilpa Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand
  • Prattana Sittiwattanawong Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand

Keywords:

Allergic contact dermatitis, education, digital, video

Abstract

Background: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory skin disease resulting from exposure to allergen. The patient education is crucial to successful treatment and management of ACD. However, this process can be time consuming, requiring trained healthcare personnel resulting in increased workload and may be difficult in the setting of limited workforce or resource.

Objective: To assess the effect of informative digitalized video-based educational program (iDVE) on patients’ quality of life, disease severity and knowledge of ACD compared to standard counselling (control).

Methods: Patients with ACD were randomized to participate in iDVE or control group. The primary outcome was the effect on patients’ quality of life using dermatology life quality index (DLQI) score at initial and follow-up visits at 1-month, 3-months and 6-months. The secondary outcomes were disease severity using eczema area and severity index (EASI) score and the scoring atopic dermatitis (SCORAD) score, patients’ knowledge and confidence at initial and each follow-up visits compared to control.

Results: Seventy-four patients were enrolled, of which 38 patients were allocated to iDVE group and 36 to control group. At 3-month and 6-month follow-up, there were significant changes of DLQI from baseline in iDVE compared to control group (- 7.00 gif.latex?\pm 6.73 vs. - 3.56 gif.latex?\pm 7.29, P = 0.047; and - 9.03 gif.latex?\pm 7.36 vs. - 4.18 gif.latex?\pm 7.51, P = 0.01, respectively). DLQI at 6-months in iDVE group was also significantly lower compared to control (2.47 gif.latex?\pm 3.66 vs. 5.27 gif.latex?\pm 5.85, P = 0.023).

Conclusion: The informative digitalized video-based educational program can significantly improve patients’ quality of life and may has positive impact on disease severity and patients’ knowledge regarding allergic contact dermatitis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mowad CM, Anderson B, Scheinman P, Pootongkam S, Nedorost S, Brod B. Allergic contact dermatitis: Patient management and education. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016;74:1043-54.

Peiser M, Tralau T, Heidler J, Api AM, Arts JH, Basketter DA, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembledat an international workshop at BfR, Germany. Cell Mol Life Sci 2012;69:763-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0846-8

Ring J. Occupational skin disease - a major health problem in Europe. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31:919-20.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14307

Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menné T, Johansen JD. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population-prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:287-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01220.x

Boonchai W, Iamtharachai P, Sunthonpalin P. Prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis in Thailand. Dermatitis 2008;19:142-5.

https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2008.07112

Adams RM. Patch testing for occupational allergens and the evaluation of patients with occupational contact dermatitis. Allergy Proc 1990;11:117-20. https://doi.org/10.2500/108854190778880259

Wongpiyabovorn J, Puvabanditsin P. Result of standard patch test in patients suspected of having allergic contact dermatitis. J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88 Suppl 4:S177-83.

Disphanurat W. Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2010;93 Suppl 7:S7-14.

Johnston GA, Exton LS, Mohd Mustapa MF, Slack JA, Coulson IH, English JS, et al. British Association of Dermatologists' guidelines for the management of contact dermatitis 2017. Br J Dermatol 2017;176:317-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.15239

Wilson EA, Wolf MS. Working memory and the desig of health materials: a cognitive factors perspective. Patient Educ Couns 2009;74:318-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.005

Baddeley A. The fractionation of working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:13468-72.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.13468

Baddeley A. Working memory. Science 1992;255:556-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359

Naismith LM, Cheung JJ, Ringsted C, Cavalcanti RB. Limitations of subjective cognitive load measures in simulation-based procedural training. Med Educ 2015;49:805-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12732

Penney CG. Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Mem Cognit 1989;17:398-422.

https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202613

Downloads

Published

2023-07-18

How to Cite

1.
Viarasilpa W, Sittiwattanawong P. Efficacy of digitalized comprehensive educational program for patients with allergic contact dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial. Chula Med J [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 18 [cited 2024 May 20];66(4). Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/103