Clinical outcomes of spinal schwannoma microsurgery

Authors

  • Nattawut Niljianskul Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Dusit, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Microsurgery, neurological outcomes, risk factors, spinal schwannoma

Abstract

Background: Gross total resection of solitary spinal schwannomas (SS) and preservation of neurological functions are the gold standard of treatment for symptomatic patients; however, some patients present with postoperative neurological deficit.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the neurological outcomes of SS microsurgery and identify the risk factors of postoperative neurological deficit among patients at the Vajira Hospital.

Methods: The following preoperative and postoperative neurological outcome measurements were reviewed at 1, 6, and 12 months according to the following procedure: Frankel Grading, McCormick Score, American Spinal Injury Association Grading, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale, and Japanese Orthopedic Association Score. The predictive values of various clinical factors were assessed.

Results: Fifty patients (mean age, 49.0  16.3 years) underwent the surgery, and 79.6% of them presented with pain. The tumors were located in the thoracic (27.3%), cervical (22.7%), and cauda equina (20.5%) regions. Most tumors were intradural/extramedullary (81.8%). A statistically significant improvement between the preoperative and postoperative neurological outcomes was observed (P < 0.05). Intraoperative blood loss (odds ratio [OR], 1.007; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001 - 1.013; P = 0.026) and operative time (OR, 2.629; 95% CI, 1.164 - 5.936; P = 0.02) were associated with postoperative neurological deficit.

Conclusion: SS may occur at any levels in the spine and is typically intradural in location. Treatment with microsurgery significantly improved the postoperative neurological outcomes of the patients. However, intraoperative blood loss and operative time are the risk factors associated with the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Seppälä MT, Haltia MJ, Sankila RJ, Jääskeläinen JE,Heiskanen O. Long-term outcome after removal ofspinal schwannoma: a clinicopathological study of187 cases. J Neurosurg 1995;83:621-6.

https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.4.0621

Li P, Zhao F, Zhang J, Wang Z, Wang X, Wang B, et al.Clinical features of spinal schwannomas in 65 patientswith schwannomatosis compared with 831 with solitaryschwannomas and 102 with neurofibromatosis type 2:a retrospective study at a single institution. JNeurosurg Spine 2016;24:145-54.

https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.3.SPINE141145

Hirano K, Imagama S, Sato K, Kato F, Yukawa Y,Yoshihara H, et al. Primary spinal cord tumors:reviewof 678 surgically treated patients in Japan. Amulticenter study. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2019-26.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2345-5

Conti P, Pansini G, Mouchaty H, Capuano C, Conti R.Spinal neurinomas: retrospective analysis and long-term outcome of 179 consecutively operated casesand review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2004;61:34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00537-8

Jeon JH, Hwang HS, Jeong JH, Park SH, Moon JG,Kim CH. Spinal Schwannoma;analysis of 40 cases. JKorean Neurosurg Soc 2008;43:135-8. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2008.43.3.135

Ohnishi Y, Iwatsuki K, Ohkawa T, Ninomiya K,Moriwaki T, Yoshimine T. Differences between cervicalschwannomas of the anterior and posterior nerveroots in relation to the incidence of postoperativeradicular dysfunction. Asian Spine J 2015;9:263-70.

https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.2.263

Zou F, Guan Y, Jiang J, Lu F, Chen W, Xia X, et al.Factors affecting postoperative neurological deficitsafter nerve root resection for the treatment of spinalIntradural schwannomas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016;41:384-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001248

Emel E, Abdallah A, Sofuoglu OE, Ofluoglu AE,Gunes M, Guler B, et al. Long-term surgical treatmentoutcomes of spinal schwannomas: retrospectiveanalysis of 49 consecutively operated cases. TurkNeurosurg 2017;27:217-25.

Safaee M, Parsa AT, Barbaro NM, Chou D,Mummaneni PV, Weinstein PR, et al. Association oftumor location, extent of resection, and neurofibro-matosis status with clinical outcomes for 221 spinalnerve sheath tumors. Neurosurg Focus 2015;39:E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.FOCUS15183

Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, Richards S,Kahn N, Zadeh JA, et al. The impact of self-retainingretractors on the paraspinal muscles during posteriorspinal surgery. Spine 2002;27:2758-62.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200212150-00004

Teli M, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M, Zagra A, Corriero A,Giudici F, et al. Higher risk of dural tears and recurrentherniation with lumbar micro-endoscopic discectomy.Eur Spine J 2010;19:443-50.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1290-4

Celli P. Treatment of relevant nerve roots involved innerve sheath tumors: removal or preservation?Neurosurgery 2002;51:684-92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200209000-00012

Klekamp J, Samii M. Surgery of spinal nerve sheathtumors with special reference to neurofibromatosis.Neurosurgery 1998;42:279-89. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199802000-00042

Downloads

Published

2023-04-10

How to Cite

1.
Niljianskul N. Clinical outcomes of spinal schwannoma microsurgery. Chula Med J [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 10 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];67(2). Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/12