Comparing cytological adequacy between conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: A prospective study

Authors

  • Nattachai Kruajak Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Pawanrat Kranokpiraksa Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Tikamporn Jitpasutham Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

FNA, thyroid nodule, liquid based cytology, adequacy

Abstract

Background: The major problem of conventional smear for ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules is the sample inadequacy. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is claimed to perform better than the conventional smear (CS) in reducing sample inadequacy. However, the evidence of better adequacy in LBC is unclear.

Objective: This study is the first prospective study aiming to compare sample adequacy in CS and LBC using ThinPrep system with adequacy criteria based on the 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.

Methods: One hundred and twenty thyroid nodules were prospectively recruited for ultrasound-guided FNA from March to September 2019. The sample from each nodule was prepared in both CS and LBC using a randomised needle size between 25 or 23G. The cytological adequacy for each method was reviewed by only one pathologist.

Results: There was no significant difference in adequacy rate between the CS and LBC group (57.5% vs. 53.3%, P = 0.371). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed only two factors to be significantly associated with adequacy, including the presence of internal vascularity on ultrasound (adjusted RR = 1.3, P = 0.038) and the use of 25G needles compared with 23G needles (adjusted RR = 1.4, P = 0.013).

Conclusion: This prospective study did not demonstrate the superiority of LBC over CS. The presence of internal vascularity on ultrasound is a potential predictor of FNA adequacy. The use of a 25G needle may be recommended rather than a 23G needle in thyroid FNA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chong Y, Ji SJ, Kang CS, Lee EJ. Can liquid-based preparation substitute for conventional smear in thyroid fine-needle aspiration? A systematic review based on meta-analysis. Endocr Connect 2017;6:817-29. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-17-0165

Park CJ, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Yoon JH, Park VY, Kwak JY. Thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic cytologic results: Follow-up management using ultrasound patterns based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines. Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:412-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.18532

Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;132:658-65. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPPHLWMI3JV4LA

Choi SH, Han KH, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Son EJ, Youk JH, et al. Factors affecting inadequate sampling of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2011;74:776-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04011.x

Grani G, Calvanese A, Carbotta G, D'Alessandri M, Nesca A, Bianchini M, et al. Intrinsic factors affecting adequacy of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013;78:141-4.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04507.x

Cavaliere A, Colella R, Puxeddu E, Gambelunghe G, Avenia N, d'Ajello M, et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: conventional vs thin layer technique. J Endocrinol Invest 2008;31:303-8.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03346362

British Thyroid Association Royal College of Physicians. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. 2nd ed. Report of the Thyroid Cancer Guidelines Update Group. London: Royal College of Physicians;2007.

Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid 2017;27:1341-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2017.0500

Liu X, Cai Y, Wang Z, Cui D, Fan H, Jiang L, et al. Adequacy rate comparison between liquid-based cytology using SurePath versus conventional smears in detecting thyroid malignancies. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2016;9:4448-54.

Rossi ED, Zannoni GF, Moncelsi S, Stigliano E, Santeusanio G, Lombardi CP, et al. Application of liquid-based cytology to fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the thyroid gland. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2012;3:57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2012.00057

Hologic, Inc. ThinPrep body fluids quick reference guide [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Mar 4]. Available from: http://www.hologic.ca/products/clinicaldiagnostics-and-blood-screening/assays-and-tests/thinprep-non-gyn-test.

Cochand-Priollet B, Prat JJ, Polivka M, Thienpont L, Dahan H, Wassef M, et al. Thyroid fine needle aspiration: the morphological features on ThinPrepslide preparations. Eighty cases with histological control. Cytopathology 2003;14:343-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-5507.2003.00098.x

Lee YJ, Kim DW, Jung SJ, Baek HJ. Factors that influence sample adequacy in liquid-based cytology after ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a single-center centre study. Acta Cytological 2018;62:253-8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486442

Mygdakos N, Nikolaidou S, Tzilivaki A, Tamiolakis D. Liquid Based Preparation (LBP) cytology versus Conventional Cytology (CS) in FNA samples from breast, thyroid, salivary glands and soft tissues. Our experience in Crete (Greece). Rom J Morphol Embryol 2009;50:245-50.

de Koster EJ, Kist JW, Vriens MR, Borel Rinkes IH, Valk GD, de Keizer B. Thyroid ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: the positive influence of onsite adequacy assessment and number of needle passes on diagnostic cytology rate. Acta Cytol 2016;60:39-45.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000444917

Jung SJ, Kim DW, Baek HJ. Comparison study of the adequacy and pain scale of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid thyroid nodules with a 21- or 23-gauge needle for liquid-based cytology: A single-center study. Endocr Pathol 2018;29:30-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-017-9508-1

Moss WJ, Finegersh A, Pang J, Califano JA, Coffey CS, Orosco RK, et al. Needle biopsy of routine thyroid nodules should be performed using a capillary action technique with 24 - to 27-gauge needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid 2018;28:857-63. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2017.0643

Tangpricha V, Chen BJ, Swan NC, Sweeney AT, de las Morenas A, Safer JD. Twenty-one-gauge needles provide more cellular samples than twenty-five-gauge needles in fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid but may not provide increased diagnostic accuracy. Thyroid 2001;11:973-6.

https://doi.org/10.1089/105072501753211055

Limlunjakorn P. Keelawat S, Bychkov A. Evaluation of thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology by the Bethesda Reporting System: a retrospective analysis of rates and outcomes from the King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2017;100:783-92.

Keelawat S, Rangdaeng S, Koonmee S, Jitpasutham T, Bychkov A. Current status of thyroid fine-needle aspiration practice in Thailand. J Pathol Transl Med 2017;51:565-70.

https://doi.org/10.4132/jptm.2017.08.12

Downloads

Published

2023-07-19

How to Cite

1.
Kruajak N, Kranokpiraksa P, Jitpasutham T. Comparing cytological adequacy between conventional smear and liquid-based cytology in ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: A prospective study. Chula Med J [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 19 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];65(3). Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/146