Sex determination through anthropometry of hand and foot in Thais

Metinee  Romphothong; Pongpon  Traithepchanapai

Authors

Metinee Romphothong Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Pongpon Traithepchanapai Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Sex determination, anthropometry, dismemberment, hand, foot, Thai

Abstract

Background: Sex determination is one of the most important aspects in forensic anthropology for the identification of unknown remains, especially dismemberment or mass disaster cases in which mutilated or fragmented remains are usually discovered; it is difficult to establish the identity of a long deceased body. The acquired sex data are used by investigators for narrowing down ante-mortem data which can be derived from the relatives of the deceased before comparing to the postmortem data.

Objective: This study aimed to estimate sex using hand and foot measurements by measuring the external parts of the bodies in a Thai population.

Methods: Subjects were 100 Thai cadavers (50 males and 50 females), 20 - 60 years old, randomly selected. The 8 parameters from the hand and 3 parameters from the foot were measured using Mitutoyo digital calipers in SI units up to the accuracy of 3 decimals after breaking rigor mortis. Collected data were statistically analyzed using SPSS version 22. Cut-off values and accuracies were calculated for sex determinations.

Results: Highly significant sex differences were found in hand parameters and foot parameters with males larger than females (P <0.001), except for the heel breadth; the hand and foot indexes were not significantly different between sexes. The cut-off values for sex determinations were derived from all of the measurements; values that are more than the cut-off point suggest male and less than the cut-off value suggest female sex. Hand length and 3rd finger in both sides showed the highest accuracies for sex determination and accuracies to differentiate between sexs were above 90%. In the foot, the highest accuracy to differentiate sex was the foot length, followed by the foot breadth with accuracy above 80%.

Conclusion: Hand and foot parameters can be successfully applied for sex determination in Thais. Therefore, sex can be determined from the parameters of hands and feet with reasonable accuracy using the cut-off values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kanchan T, Menezes RG, Moudgil R, Kaur R, Kotian MS, Garg RK. Stature estimation from foot length using universal regression formula in a North Indian population. J Forensic Sci 2010;55:163-6.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01243.x

Christensen AM, Passalacqua NV, Bartelink EJ. Forensic anthropology: current methods and practice. San Diego, CA: Elsevier; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-418671-2.00005-7

Phutiwat P, Duangjit S. Gender determination of Thais by measurements of adult femurs. J Sci Tech, UBU 2012;2:65-70.

Chalermphak K. Sex identification and height estimation from digital radiograph of femoral epiphysis [thesis]. Bangkok: Silpakorn University; 2013.

White TD, Folkens PA. The human bone manual. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2005.

Blau S, Ubelaker DH. Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology. California: Left Coast Press; 2009.

Dey S, Kapoor AK. Sex determination form dimension for forensic identification. International J Res Med Sci 2015;3:1466-72. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20150169

Barrier IL, L'Abbé EN. Sex determination from the radius and ulna in a modern South African sample. Forensic Sci Int 2008;179:85.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.04.012

Iscan MY, Steyn M. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher; 2013.

Kanchan T, Krishan K. Personal identification in forensic examinations. Anthropol 2013;2:114.

Mahakknaukrauh P. Anatomy and forensic anthropology of the human bone.2 nd ed. Bangkok: Siampimnana Publishers; 2013.

Hemy N, Flavel A, Ishak NI, Franklin D. Sex estimation using anthropometry of feet and footprint in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 2013;231:402.e1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.05.029

Varu PR, Gajera CN, Mangal HM, Modi PM. Determination of sex using hand dimensions. Int J Med Toxicol Forensic Med 2016;6:23-8.

Zeybek G, Ergur I, Demiroglu Z. Stature and gender estimation using foot measurements. Forensic Sci Int 2008;181:54.e1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.08.003

Ozden H, Balci Y, Demirustu C, Targut A, Ertugrul M. Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions. Forensic Sci Int 2005;147:181-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.072

Danborno B, Elukpo A. Sexual dimorphism in hand and foot length, Indices, stature-ratio and relationship to height in Nigerians. Internet J Forensic Sci 2008;3:1-5.

https://doi.org/10.5580/379

Fessler DM, Haley KJ, Lal RD. Sexual dimorphism in foot length proportionate to stature. Ann Hum Biol 2005;32:44-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014460400027581

Jowaheer V, Agnihotri AK. Sex identification on the basis on hand and foot measurement in Indo-Mauritian population-A model based Approach. J Forensic Leg Med 2011;18:173-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2011.02.007

Agnihotri AK, Purwar B, Jeebun N, Agnihotri S. Determination of sex by hand dimensions. Internet J Forensic Sci 2005;1:12-24.

Aboul-Hagag KE, Mohamed SA, Hilal MA, Mohamed EA. Determination of sex from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in Upper Egyptians. Egyp J Forensic Sci 2011;1:80-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2011.03.001

Ibrahim MA, Khalifa AM, Hagras AM, Alwakid N. Sex determination from hand dimension and index/ring finger length ratio in North Saudi population: Medico-legal view. Egyp Forensic Sci 2016;6:435-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfs.2016.11.002

Krishan K, Kanchan T, Sharna A. Sex determination from hand and foot dimension in a North India population. J Forensic Sci 2011;56:543-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01652.x

Kanchan T, Krishan K, Sharma A, Menezea RG. A study of correlation of hand and foot dimensions for personal identification in mass disasters. Forensic Int Sci 2010;199:112.e1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.03.002

Vallois HV. Anthropometric techniques. Curr Anthropol 1965;6:127-44.

https://doi.org/10.1086/200577

Kanchan T, Rastogi P. Sex determination from hand dimensions of North and South Indians. J Foren Sci 2009;54:546-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01018.x

Ishak NI, Hemy N, Franklin D. Estimation of stature from hand and handprint dimension in a Western Australian population. Forensic Sci Int 2012;216:199.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.09.010

Martin R, Saller K. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie, Dritte Auflage. Vol. II. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1957.

Sanli SG, Kizilkanat ED, Boyan N, Ozsahin ET, Bozkir MG, Soames R. Stature estimation based on hand length and foot length. Clin Anat 2005;18:589-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20146

Sen J, Ghosh S. Estimation of stature from foot length and foot breadth among the Rajbanshi: an indigenous population of North Bengal. Forensic Sci Int 2008;181:55e1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.08.009

Steyn M, Iscan MY, Osteometric variation in the humerus: sexual dimorphism in South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 1999:106;77-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(99)00141-3

Iscan MY, Loth SR, King CA, Shihai D, Yoshino M, Sexual dimorphism in the humerus: a comparative analysis of Chinese, Japanese and Thais. Forensic Sci Int 1998:98;17-29.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(98)00119-4

Sakaue K. Sexual determination of long bones in recent Japanese. Anthropol Sci 2004;112;75-81.

https://doi.org/10.1537/ase.00067