Factors related to human gross anatomy knowledge retention in medical students.
Keywords:
Human gross anatomy, knowledge retention, attitude, medical student, teaching arrangementAbstract
Background : Human gross anatomy is one of the most important courses in the pre-clinical program of medical curriculum. This course is based on the study of the human body, including the details of both main and subsections. The complexity of the study causes difficulties in learning, particularly remembering the content.
Objectives : To determine the factors that affect the human gross anatomy proficiency and to explore medical students’ opinions of the human gross anatomy course.
Methods : An analytical cross sectional study was conducted among 184 third-year medical students. Human gross anatomy proficiency was examined using a multiple-choice questionnaire which is composed of 15 questions. The purpose of the questionnaire was to assess three main factors: a) the student, b) the content and c) the human gross anatomy courses. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients were used in data analysis.
Results : The mean proficiency score was 7.94 (52.93%) and the mean grade in the musculoskeletal system course was 2.89. The students’ responses were correlated with their proficiency of human gross anatomy (r = 0.284; P < 0.01) and the grade in the musculoskeletal system course (r = 0.296; P < 0.01). However, the human gross anatomy content and the human gross anatomy courses were not correlated to the human gross anatomy proficiency and the grade of the musculoskeletal system course. Furthermore, the samples favored traditional teaching as the best method for learning human gross anatomy (31.9%) followed by digital lecture (31.7%).
Conclusion : The medical student’s attitude is the factor that influenced human gross anatomy proficiency. The students preferred the traditional teaching and digital methods of learning for this course. In the future, the medical student’s attitude and teaching method should be considered as important factors for course management in human gross anatomy.
Downloads
References
Manyama M, Stafford R, Mazyala E, Lukanima A, Magele N, Kidenya BR, et al. Improving gross anatomy learning using reciprocal peer teaching. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:95.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0617-1
D'Eon MF. Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-5
Chung EK, Nam KI, Oh SA, Han ER, Woo YJ, Hitchcock MA. Advance organizers in a gross anatomy dissection course and their effects on academic achievement. Clin Anat 2013;26:327-32.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22089
Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT. Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2013; 14:4-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Day CS, Yeh AC, Franko O, Ramirez M, Krupat E. Musculoskeletal medicine: an assessment of the attitudes and knowledge of medical students at Harvard Medical School. Acad Med 2007;82:452-7.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803ea860
Shiozawa T, Butz B, Herlan S, Kramer A, Hirt B. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students' academic performance in applied clinical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2017;10:46-52.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1623
Smith CF, Martinez-Alvarez C, McHanwell S. The context of learning anatomy: does it make a difference? J Anat 2014;224:270-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12089
Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. J Clin Nurs 2007;16:234-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
Gonsalvez DG, Ovens M, Ivanusic J. Does attendance at anatomy practical classes correlate with assessment outcome? A retro spective study of a large cohort of undergraduate anatomy students. BMC Med Educ 2015;15:231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0515-y
Plaisant O, Stephens S, Apaydin N, Courtois R, Lignier B, Loukas M, et al. Medical students' attitudes towards science and gross anatomy, and the relationship to personality. J Anat 2014;224:261-9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12043
Han ER, Chung EK, Nam KI. Peer-assisted learning in a gross anatomy dissection course. PLoS One 2015;10:e0142988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142988
Singh A, Min AK. Digital lectures for learning gross anatomy: a study of their efficacy. Korean J Med Educ 2017;29:27-32. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2017.50
Chapman SJ, Hakeem AR, Marangoni G, Prasad KR. Anatomy in medical education: perceptions of undergraduate medical students. Ann Anat 2013;195:409-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2013.03.005
Bergman EM, de Bruin AB, Herrler A, Verheijen IW, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CP. Students' perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study. BMC Med Educ 2013;13:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-152
Moxham BJ, Plaisant O. Perception of medical students towards the clinical relevance of anatomy. Clin Anat 2007;20:560-4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20453
Drake RL, Vogl W, Mitchell AWM. Gray's anatomy for students. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2010.
ราชบัณฑิตยสภา.พจนานุกรมฉบับราชบัณฑิตยสถาน พ.ศ. ๒๕๕๔ เฉลิมพระเกียรติพระบาทสมเด็จ พระเจ้าอยู่หัว เนื่องในโอกาสพระราชพิธีมหามงคลเฉลิมพระชนมพรรษา ๗ รอบ ๕ ธันวาคม ๒๕๕๔. กรุงเทพ: ราชบัณฑิตยสภา; 2556.
Phillips AW, Smith SG, Ross CF, Straus CM. Direct correlation of radiologic and cadaveric structures in a gross anatomy course. Med Teach 2012;34:e779-84. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.687492
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chulalongkorn Medical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
