Treatment gaps in migraine preventive treatment-eligible patients: A hospital-based study in Thailand

Authors

  • Thanin Asawavichienjinda Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Medication overuse headache, migraine, prevalence, preventive-eligible, preventive treatment, treatment gaps

Abstract

Background: Preventive treatment of migraine is necessary for patients with frequent attacks to avoid progression and medication overuse. Only a few studies have demonstrated the low prevalence of preventive- eligible migraine patients having received migraine preventive treatments.

Objective: To investigate the prevalence of preventive migraine treatments in eligible patients in Thailand.

Methods: A hospital registry-based cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2007 and June 2022 in migraine patients at the Chulalongkorn Comprehensive Headache Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, and Thai Red Cross Society. Data collected at the first visit were extracted from the patient registry. The proportion of preventive treatments among patients with variable migraine severity classified by the number of monthly migraine days was evaluated.

Results: Of the 681 patients in the registry, 572 aged ³15 years were included. The prevalence of patients with a history of ever using migraine preventive treatment was 14.7%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of receiving preventive treatment among the patients with variable migraine severity classified by the number of migraine days per month. Among the treatment-eligible participants, the prevalence of preventive treatment was 12.9%.

Conclusion: This was the first hospital-based study in any Eastern country that revealed a prevailing low prevalence of preventive treatments among migraine patients. Preventive treatment is critical to migraine progression. Health education on existing preventive treatments is needed to raise awareness among patients. More relevant studies are needed in Asian countries to replicate these findings. To improve the scientific quality of relevant studies, future research should be conducted by gathering data from primary sources and retrieving previous treatments from medical records.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buse DC, Greisman JD, Baigi K, Lipton RB. Migraine progression: a systematic review. Headache 2019;59:306-38.

https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13459

Headache classification committee of the international headache society (IHS) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018;38:1-211.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202

Ailani J, Burch RC, Robbins MS, Board of directors of the American headache society. The American headache society consensus statement: update on integrating new migraine treatments into clinical practice. Headache 2021;61:1021-39.

https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14153

Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF; AMPP Advisory Group. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 2007;68:343-9.

https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21

Ha H, Gonzalez A. Migraine headache prophylaxis. Am Fam Physician 2019;99:17-24.

Silberstein S, Loder E, Diamond S, Reed ML, Bigal ME, Lipton RB; AMPP advisory Group. Probable migraine in the United States: results of the American Migraine Prevalence And Prevention (AMPP) study. Cephalalgia 2007;27:220-9.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01275.x

Krobot KJ, Steinberg HW, Pfaffenrath V. Migraine prescription density and recommendations. Results of the PCAOM Study. Cephalalgia 1999;19:511-19.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019005511.x

Nahas SJ, Buse DC, Hutchinson S, Reed ML, Fanning KM, Dabruzzo B, et al. Characterizing preventive treatment gaps in migraine: results from the CaMEO study [abstract]. Headache 2021;61 Suppl 1:42.

https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.96.15_supplement.1514

Headache Classification Subcommittee Of The International Headache Society. The international classification of headache disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004;24 Suppl 1:9-160.

Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia 2013;33:629-808.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102413485658

Jedynak J, Eross E, Gendolla A, Rettiganti M, Stauffer VL. Shift from high-frequency to low-frequency episodic migraine in patients treated with Galcanezumab: results from two global randomized clinical trials. J Headache Pain 2021;22:48.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-021-01222-w

Kantor D. The impact of migraine on school performance. Neurology 2012;79:e168-9.

https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182745a97

Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Sheftell FD. Assessment of migraine disability using the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire: a comparison of chronic migraine with episodic migraine. Headache 2003;43:336-42.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.2003.03068.x

Bigal ME, Serrano D, Reed M, Lipton RB. Chronic migraine in the population: Burden, diagnosis, and satisfaction with treatment. Neurology 2008;71:559-66.

https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000323925.29520.e7

Aurora SK, Brin MF. Chronic migraine: an update on physiology, imaging, and the mechanism of action of two available pharmacologic therapies. Headache 2017;57:109-25.

https://doi.org/10.1111/head.12999

Silberstein SD, Goadsby PJ. Migraine: preventive treatment. Cephalalgia 2002;22:491-512.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00386.x

Silberstein SD. Preventive migraine treatment. Neurol Clin 2009;27:429-43.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2008.11.007

Evers S. Treatment of migraine with prophylactic drugs. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2008;9:2565-73.

https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.9.15.2565

Asawavichienjinda T, Vorasayan P, Noiwattanakul J, Phanthumchinda K. Validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the Thai version of the Migraine-Specific Quality of life questionnaire version 2.1. Asian Biomed 2017;11:331-42.

https://doi.org/10.1515/abm-2018-0005

Asawavichienjinda T, Jattawanin J. Independent predictors of migraine quality of life in a developing country. Teikyo Med J 2021;44:1861-67.

Asawavichienjinda T, Imruetaijaroenchoke W, Phanthumchinda K. Thai-version Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire: concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and factors predictive for migraine-related disability. Asian Biomed 2020;14:139-50.

https://doi.org/10.1515/abm-2020-0021

Downloads

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

1.
Asawavichienjinda T. Treatment gaps in migraine preventive treatment-eligible patients: A hospital-based study in Thailand . Chula Med J [internet]. 2024 Dec. 27 [cited 2025 Jan. 30];69(1). available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/3834