Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) on Thai smokers

Authors

  • Thaniya Klinsophon Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University
  • Premtip Thaveeratitham Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University
  • Prawit Janwantanakul Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), positive affect, negative affect, reliability, Thai smokers

Abstract

Background : Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is a questionnaire for evaluating the affect which is one of the factors associated with smoking relapse and is widely used in clinics and in research. The original version of PANAS is in English and has been translated into many languages. However, there has been no translation available into the Thai language.

Objectives : To translate PANAS into the Thai language by using the standard method according to the cross-cultural adaptation process and to evaluate the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of PANAS in Thai smokers.

Methods : PANAS was translated into Thai. Participants – current smokers – completed the questionnaire twice, at baseline and seven days after. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC (3, 1)) and Cronbach’s alpha were calculated for the test-retest reliability and internal consistency, respectively.

Results : The average age of 60 participants was 35.2 years old. They averagely smoked 10.9 cigarettes per day over an average period of 12.9 years. Sixty-five percent of the participants had previously attempted to quit. The ICC (3, 1) of PANAS in Thais was 0.90 for positive affect and 0.93 for negative affect. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89 for positive affect and 0.90 for negative affect.

Conclusion : In general, PANAS in Thai demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability. Therefore, the PANAS in Thai could be used in clinics and in researches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Eriksen M, Mackay J, Schuger N, Gomeshtapah F, Drope J. The Tobacco Atlas. 5th ed. Atlanta, GA: The American Cancer Society, 2015.

Godtfredsen NS, Holst C, Prescott E, Vestbo J, Osler M. Smoking reduction, smoking cessation, and mortality: a 16-year follow-up of 19,732 men and women from The Copenhagen Centre for Prospective Population Studies. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:994-1001. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf150

O'Connell KA, Shiffman S. Negative affect smoking and smoking relapse. J Subst Abuse 1988;1:25-33.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3289(88)80005-1

Shiffman S, Paty JA, Gnys M, Kassel JA, Hickcox M. First lapses to smoking: within-subjects analysis of real-time reports. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:366-79. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.2.366

Shiffman S, Waters AJ. Negative affect and smoking lapses: a prospective analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004;72:192-201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.192

Pomerleau O, Adkins D, Pertschuk M. Predictors of outcome and recidivism in smoking cessation treatment. Addict Behav 1978;3: 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(78)90028-X

Rausch JL, Nichinson B, Lamke C, Matloff J. Influence of negative affect on smoking cessation treatment outcome: a pilot study. Br J Addict 1990;85:929-33.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1990.tb03723.x

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54:1063-70.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

Terracciano A, McCrae RR, Costa PT, Jr. Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Eur J Psychol Assess 2003;19:131-41.

https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131

Krohne HW, Egloff B, Kohlmann CW, Tausch A. Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica 1996;42:139-56.

https://doi.org/10.1037/t49650-000

Hilleras PK, Jorm AF, Herlitz A, Winblad B. Negative and positive affect among the very old: A survey on a sample age 90 years or older. Res Aging 1998;20:593-610.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027598205003

Joiner TE Jr, Sandin B, Chorot P, Lostao L, Marquina G. Development and factor analytic validation of the SPANAS among women in Spain: (more) cross-cultural convergence in the structure of mood. J Pers Assess 1997; 68:600-15. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_8

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of crosscultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 ;25:3186-91.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:i-iv, 1-74. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta2140

Downloads

Published

2023-08-23

How to Cite

1.
Klinsophon T, Thaveeratitham P, Janwantanakul P. Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) on Thai smokers. Chula Med J [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 23 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];61(3). Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/454