Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Keywords:
Acute appendicitis, diagnosis, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, ultrasonographyAbstract
Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergency abdominal surgical condition with a yearly incidence rate of approximately 140 per 100,000 persons in Thailand between 2014 to 2017. The diagnosis of appendicitis is mainly relied on clinical manifestations, but these diagnostic approaches are not always accurate. Imaging tests such as graded compression ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) have become more commonly used to improve the diagnostic performance.
Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH).
Methods: We retrospectively gathered data from the records of 85 adult patients, suspected acute appendicitis and underwent abdominal US at KCMH between January 2010 and December 2017. We collected patient’s demographic data, clinical history, laboratory findings, US report and subsequent CT imaging, surgical report and pathological findings. Surgical record and histopathologic analysis were the reference standard.
Results: Overall, US had sensitivity 69.0% (95% CI, 49.2 – 84.7), specificity 89.3% (95% CI, 78.1 – 96.0), accuracy 82.4% (95% CI, 72.6 – 89.8), positive predictive value (PPV) 76.9% (95% CI, 56.4 – 91.0) and negative predictive values (NPV) 84.7% (95% CI, 73.0 – 92.8) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult patients. The enlarged appendix diameter 6 mm finding showed the highest sensitivity, accuracy and NPV.
Conclusion: US might be useful imaging modality to diagnose acute appendicitis in adult patients not just in some specific condition. The evidence of enlarged appendix diameter 6 mm is the most accurate appendiceal finding for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Downloads
References
Liang MK, Andersson RE, Jaffe BM, Berger DH. Chapter 30: The appendix. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, et al., editors. Schwartz's principles of surgery. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2015. p.1-33.
Bureau of policy and strategy, office of the permanent secretary of MOPH. Public health statistics [Internet].Bangkok. WVO officer of printing mail; 2015.
Royal College of Surgeons of Thailand. Guidelines for the treatment of patients undergoing surgery for appendicitis; 2017.
Wagner JM, McKinney WP, Carpenter JL. Does this patient have appendicitis? JAMA 1996;276:1589-94.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.276.19.1589
Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000;215:337-48.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma24337
Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 1986;158:355-60.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.158.2.2934762
Puylaert JB, van der Zant FM, Rijke AM. Sonography and the acute abdomen: practical considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:179-86. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.1.8976943
Garcia EM, Camacho MA, Karolyi DR, Kim DH, Cash BD, Chang KJ, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:S373-87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.09.033
Chiu YH, Chen JD, Wang SH, Tiu CM, How CK, Lai JI, et al. Whether intravenous contrast is necessary for CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult ED patients? Acad Radiol 2013;20:73-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.07.007
Drake FT, Alfonso R, Bhargava P, Cuevas C, Dighe MK, Florence MG, et al. Enteral contrast in the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis: comparative effectiveness in a prospective surgical cohort. Ann Surg 2014;260:311-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000272
Boland GWL. Colon and appendix. In: Boland GWL, editor. The requisites gastrointestinal imaging. 4th ed. Philadelphia. Elsevier Saunders; 2014. p. 156-217.
Hershko DD, Sroka G, Bahouth H, Ghersin E, Mahajna A, Krausz MM. The role of selective computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of suspected acute appendicitis. Am Surg 2002;68:1003-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480206801114
Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:1319-25.
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781319
Oto A, Srinivasan PN, Ernst RD, Koroglu M, Cesani F, Nishino T, et al. Revisiting MRI for appendix location during pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:883-7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0270
Smith MP, Katz DS, Lalani T, Carucci LR, Cash BD, Kim DH, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® Right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. Ultrasound Q 2015;31:85-91
https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000118
Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, Lesnik A, Blayac P, Blayac M, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 2004;230:472-8.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2302021520
Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, Megibow AJ, Roshkow J, Gray C. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994;190:31-5. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259423
Lourenco P, Brown J, Leipsic J, Hague C. The current utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 2016;40:944-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.03.012
Pare JR, Langlois BK, Scalera SA, Husain LF, Douriez C, Chiu H, et al. Revival of the use of ultrasound in screening for appendicitis in young adult men. J Clin Ultrasound 2016; 44:3-11.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22282
Piyarom P, Kaewlai R. False-negative appendicitis at ultrasound: nature and association. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014;40:1483-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chulalongkorn Medical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.