Sick building syndrome and stress among office workers.

Authors

  • A. Ritwichai Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • N. Buathong Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Keywords:

Sick Building Syndrome (SBS), stress, office worker

Abstract

Background : Sick building syndrome (SBS) is defined with non – specific symptoms among office workers of certain buildings. Many of the symptoms seem to be associated with environmental and psychosocial factors at the workplace. However, the association between SBS and stress has not been studied in Thailand.

Objectives : To estimate the prevalence of SBS and stress among office workers and to determine the association between SBS and stress their related factors.

Methods  : Data were obtained from the office workers at SM Tower office building from July to October 2014. A total of 273 participants were recruited. Participants completed four questionnaires regarding to demographic characteristic, environmental in working condition, SBS questionnaires and Suanprung Stress Test-20 (SPST - 20), the data were analyzed using percentage, mean, standard deviation, chi-square test and multiple logistic regression.

Results : The prevalence of SBS was 37.4%. The prevalence of mild, moderate, high and severe stress status were 11.4, 29.3, 44.3 and 15.0 percent respectively. In multivariate analysis, the statistically significant factors with SBS were severe stress status (OR = 4.90, 95%CI = 1.55 - 15.48), duration of using computer more than 8 hours per day (OR = 2.53, 95%CI = 1.28 - 5.00), materials of office flooring from PVC or plastic (OR = 2.13, 95%CI = 1.15 - 3.95), and using the effluvium office equipment such as correcting fluid and glue (OR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.09 - 3.57).

Conclusion : The occupational health and safety unit should emphasize not only the conditions of safe and healthy environmental factors in the office building but also the strategies for coping with stress of the office workers in order to reduce the SBS and to promote the quality of life among them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ฉัตรชัย เอกปัญญาสกุล. ผลกระทบต่อสุขภาพ จากคุณภาพสิ่งแวดล้อมในอาคาร. ใน: อดุลย์ บัณฑุกุล.บรรณาธิการ. ตำราอาชีวเวชศาสตร์, พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 1. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์ราชทัณฑ์; 2554 หน้า 161-83.

ฉัตรชัย เอกปัญญาสกุล . ความชุกและปัจจัยที่เกี่ยวข้องกับกลุ่มอาการป่วยเหตุอาคารของผู้ที่ทำงานในอาคารสำนักงานในเขตกรุงเทพมหานคร [วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญาวิทยาศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต]. กรุงเทพฯ : จุฬาลงกรณ์ มหาวิทยาลัย ; 2546.

Burge PS. Sick building syndrome. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:185-90.

https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2003.008813

World Health Organization. Sick building syndrome. Local authorities, health and environment briefing pamphlet series 2. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europ,1995.

Ekpanyaskul C, Jiamjarasrangsi W. The influence of indoor environment quality on psychosocial work climate among office workers. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:S202-S6.

สุวัฒน์ มหัตนิรันดร์กุล, วนิดา พุ่มไพศาลชัย, พิมพ์มาศ ตาปัญญา. การสร้างแบบวัดความเครียดสวนปรุง. วารสารสวนปรุง 2540;13:1-20.

World Health Organization. Indoor Air Pollutants: Exposure and Health Effects. EURO Reports and Studies NO78. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe;1983.

Godish T. Sick buildings: definition, diagnosis and mitigation. Indiana: Lewis;1994.

รวิวรรณ นิวาตพันธุ์. Somatoform Disorder. ใน:บุรณี กาญจนถวัลย์, พีรพนธ์ ลือบุญธวัชชัย, บรรณาธิการ. พฤติกรรมมนุษย์และความผิด ปกติทางจิต. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์ จุ ฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย ; 2547. หน้า 137-46.

Runeson R, Wahlstedt K, Wieslande G, Norback D. Personal and psychosocial factors and symptoms compatible with sick building syndrome in the Swedish workforce. Indoor Air 2006;16:445-53.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00438.x

Broberg RR, Norback D. Sick building syndrome (SBS) and sick house syndrome (SHS) in relation to psychosocial stress at work in the Swedish workforce. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2013;86:915-22.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0827-8

Bjornsson E, Janson C, Norback D, Boman G. Symptoms related to the sick building syndrome in a general population sample: associations with atopy, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and anxiety. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1998;2:1023-8.

Lahtinen M, Sundman-Digert C, Reijula K. Psychosocial work environment and indoor air problems: a questionaire as a means of problems diagnosis. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:143-9.

https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2002.005835

Jaakkola MS, Jaakkola JJK. Office equipment and supplies: A modern occupation health concern? Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:1223-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009949

Walllace LA, Nelson CJ, Highssmith R, Dunteman G. Association of personal and workplace characteristics with health, comfort and oder: a survey of 3,948 office workers in three buildings. Indoor Air 1993;3:193-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1993.t01-1-00005.x

Downloads

Published

2023-08-24

How to Cite

1.
Ritwichai A, Buathong N. Sick building syndrome and stress among office workers. Chula Med J [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 24 [cited 2024 Dec. 23];61(4). Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/471

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.