Comparative accuracy of unenhanced and IV-contrast enhanced MDCT in detection of acute appendicitis in adult patients
Keywords:
Appendicitis, appendix, computed tomography, unenhanced, Contrast Enhanced CTAbstract
Background: Computed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality for suspected acute appendicitis. However, optimal CT technique remains controversial.
Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced CT with standard IV-contrast enhanced CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult patients and whether body mass index (BMI) affects the diagnosis.
Methods: A total of 209 patients (70 males and 139 females) with clinically suspected acute appendicitis underwent both unenhanced and IV-contrast enhanced CT with rectal contrast administration. We retrospectively reviewed radiographic findings of appendicitis, appendiceal visualization, likelihood of appendicitis and alternative diagnoses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, unpaired t - test and the Chi-square test were used.
Results: One hundred seventeen patients underwent appendectomy with definitely diagnosed appendicitis in 114 (54.5%) patients. Areas under the ROC curves were 0.88 (95% CI; 0.83 -0.92) for unenhanced and 0.92 (95% CI; 0.88 - 0.95) for enhanced CT without significant difference (P = 0.07). Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy for unenhanced scan were about 86.7%, 88.5% and 87.6% compared with 93.9%, 89.5% and 91.9% for enhanced scan. Scores for visualization of the appendix were significantly higher in enhanced scan than in unenhanced scan of patients with normal BMI (P = 0.0002).
Conclusions: Unenhanced CT has comparable diagnostic performance with enhanced CT for diagnosing acute appendicitis, regarding of BMI. However, diagnostic confidence and visualization of the appendix in normal BMI patients and alternative diagnoses tend to be compromised on unenhanced CT. Therefore, IV-contrast enhanced CT may be considered for detection of appendicitis, especially in normal BMI patients.
Downloads
References
Chalazonitis AN, Tzovara I, Sammouti E, Ptohis N, Sotiropoulou E, Protoppapa E, et al. CT in appendicitis. Diagn Interv Radiol 2008;13:19-25.
Chatbanchai W, Hedley AJ, Ebrahim SB, Areemit S, Hoskyns EW, de Dombal FT. Acute abdominal pain and appendicitis in north east Thailand. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1989; 3:448-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.1989.tb00532.x
Lee JH, Park YS, Choi JS. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in South Korea: national registry data. J Epidemiol 2010;20:97-105. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20090011
Reich B, Zalut T, Weiner SG. An international evaluation of ultrasound vs. computed tomography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Int J Emerg Med 2011;4:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-4-68
Pinto LN, Pereira JM, Cunha R, Pinto P, Sirlin C. CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:406-17. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850406
Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000;215:337-48.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma24337
Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 2001;286:1748-53. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.14.1748
Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, Epelman M, Beyene J, Schuh S, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 2006;24:83-94. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2411050913
Wise SW, Labuski MR, Kasales CJ, Blebea JS, Meilstrup JW, Holley GP, et al. Comparative assessment of CT and sonographic techniques for appendiceal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:933-41. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.4.1760933
Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M, Megibow AJ, Israel G, Maki DD, et al. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis-focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 2001;220:683-90. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2202001557
Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 1999;213:341-6. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv44341
Ege G, Akman H, Sahin A, Bugra D, Kuzucu K. Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol 2002;75:721-5. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.75.897.750721
Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:763-6. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.160.4.8456661
Lane MJ, Katz DS, Ross BA, Clautice-Engle TL, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr. Unenhanced helical CT for suspected acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:405-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016216
D'Ippolito G, de Mello GG, Szejnfeld J. The value of unenhanced CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Sao Paulo Med J 1998;116:1838-45. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31801998000600003
Griffey RT, Sodickson A. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimates in emergency department patients undergoing repeat or multiple CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:887-92. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1351
Seo H, Lee KH, Kim HJ, Kim K, Kang SB, Kim SY, et al. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:96-105.
https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1237
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Hilbczuk V, Dattaro JA, Jin Z, Falzon L, Brown MD. Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med 2010;55:51-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.06.509
Xiong B, Zhong B, Li Z, Zhou F, Hu R, Feng Z, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast CT in detecting acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am Surg 2015;81:626-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481508100629
Kitagawa M, Kotani T, Miyamoto Y, Kuriu Y, Tsurudome H, Nishi H, et al. Noncontrast and contrast enhanced computed tomography for diagnosing acute appendicitis: A retrospective study for the usefulness. J Radiol Case Rep 2009;3:26-33.
https://doi.org/10.3941/jrcr.v3i6.101
Kaiser S, Finnbogason T, Jorulf HK, Soderman E, Fremckner B. Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced Helical CT. Radiology 2004;231:427-33. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030240
Keyzer C, Tack D, de Maertelaer V, Bohy P, Gevenois PA, Van Gansbeke D. Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multidetector row CT. Radiology 2004 ;232:164-72. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2321031115
Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D. Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 2002;225:400-6.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2252011551
Castro ADAE, Skare TL, Yamauchi FI, Tachibana A, Ribeiro SPP, Fonseca EKUN, et al. Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein and the influence of visceral fat in patients with obesity and acute appendicitis. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2018;31:e1339.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020180001e1339
Uba AF, Lohfa LB, Ayuba MD. Childhood acute appendicitis: Is routine appendicectomy advised? J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg 2006;11:27-30. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-9261.24634
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Chulalongkorn Medical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
