Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and minimum detectable change of visual analog scale and digital goniometer in patients with subacute unilateral lateral ankle sprain

Authors

  • Thongchai Suksri Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand and Medical Division of Armed Forces Academies Preparatory School, Nakhon – Nayok Province, Thailand
  • Chitanongk Gaogasigam Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Sujitra Boonyong Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Ankle sprain, pain, ankle and subtalar joint, range of motion, reliability

Abstract

Background: Patients with subacute unilateral lateral ankle sprain commonly experience pain and limited range of motion (ROM). Measurement reliability should be investigated before assessing treatment effectiveness.

Objective: To determine both intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of visual analog scale (VAS) and digital goniometer in patients with subacute unilateral lateral ankle sprain.

Methods: Ten subjects (7 men, 3 women; aged 29.90 gif.latex?\pm 12.81 years) with subacute unilateral lateral ankle sprain were recruited. Two investigators measured pain intensity and ROM using VAS and a digital goniometer, respectively, with a 30-minute break between measurements. The same protocol was repeated on the next day. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability measurements were analyzed to determine intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

Results: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of VAS showed excellent reliability (ICC ranged from 0.97 to 0.99), whereas ankle and subtalar joint ROM showed good to excellent reliability (ICC ranged from 0.76 to 0.97). The MDC of VAS was 5.49 mm, while MDC of the ankle and subtalar joint ROMs ranged from 2.97º to 7.97º, respectively.

Conclusion: In individuals with subacute unilateral lateral ankle sprain, the VAS and digital goniometer demonstrated good to excellent reliability in pain intensity and ankle and subtalar joint ROM. Preliminary MDC data can be used to assess treatment efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Prado MP, Mendes AA, Amodio DT, Camanho GL, Smyth NA, Fernandes TD. A comparative, prospective, and randomized study of two conservative treatment protocols for first-episode lateral ankle ligament injuries. Foot Ankle Int 2014;35:201-6.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713519776

Ferran NA, Maffulli N. Epidemiology of sprains of the lateral ankle ligament complex. Foot Ankle Clin 2006;11:659-62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2006.07.002

Wells B, Allen C, Deyle G, Croy T. Management of acute grade II lateral ankle sprain with an emphasis on ligament protection: a descriptive case series. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2019; 14:445-8. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20190445

Konradsen L, Bech L, Ehrenbjerg M, Nickelsen T. Seven years follow-up after ankle inversion trauma. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2002;12:129-35. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0838.2002.02104.x

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016;15:155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Liljequist D, Elfving B, Skavberg Roaldsen K. Intraclass correlation - A discussion and demonstration of basic features. PLoS One 2019;14:e0219854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219854

Bobak CA, Barr PJ, O'Malley AJ. Estimation of an inter-rater intra-class correlation coefficient that overcomes common assumption violations in the assessment of health measurement scales. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18:93.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0550-6

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420

Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther 1997;77:745-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/77.7.745

Villalba FJ, Policastro PO, Soliño S, Andreu M, Novoa GA, Raguzzi IA, et al. Standard measurement error and minimal detectable change of the Back-PAQ ArgSpan questionnaire: Secondary analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021;51:102315.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102315

Stipancic KL, Yunusova Y, Berry JD, Green JR. Minimally detectable change and minimal clinically important difference of a decline in sentence intelligibility and speaking rate for individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2018;61:2757-71. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0366

Cook KF, Dunn W, Griffith JW, Morrison MT, Tanquary J, Sabata D, et al. Pain assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology 2013;80:S49-S53. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e80

Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual analog scale for pain (VAS Pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS Pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:S240-S52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543

Briggs M, Closs JS. A descriptive study of the use of visual analogue scales and verbal rating scales for the assessment of postoperative pain in orthopedic patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999;18:438-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924(99)00092-5

Carey MA, Laird DE, Murray KA, Stevenson JR. Reliability, validity, and clinical usability of a digital goniometer. Work 2010;36:55-66. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2010-1007

Lynch SA. Assessment of the injured ankle in the athlete. J Athl Train 2002;37:406-12.

Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med 1998;17:101-10.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E

White DJ, Norkin CC. Basic concepts. In: Norkin CC, White DJ, eds. Measurement of Joint Motion: A guide to goniometry, 5th ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.

Musselwhite DJ, Wesolowski BC. Standard error of measurement. 1st ed: SAGE Publishing; 2018. p.1588-90.

Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Tomás M, et al. Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-43

Dontje ML, Dall PM, Skelton DA, Gill JMR, Chastin SFM, Seniors USPT. Reliability, minimal detectable change and responsiveness to change: Indicators to select the best method to measure sedentary behaviour in older adults in different study designs. PloS One 2018;13:e0195424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195424

Paungmali A, Sitilertpisan P, Taneyhill K, Pirunsan U, Uthaikhup S. Intrarater reliability of pain intensity, tissue blood flow, thermal pain threshold, pressure pain threshold and lumbo-pelvic stability tests in subjects with low back pain. Asian J Sports Med 2012;3:8-14. https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.34718

Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal ZA. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Pain Res 2018;11:851-6.

https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S158847

Konor MM, Morton S, Eckerson JM, Grindstaff TL. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012;7:279-87.

Ness BM, Sudhagoni RG, Tao H, Full OR, Seehafer LO, Walder CM, et al. The reliability of a novel heelrise test versus goniometry to assess plantarflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2018;13:19-27. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20180019

Menadue C, Raymond J, Kilbreath SL, Refshauge KM, Adams R. Reliability of two goniometric methods of measuring active inversion and eversion range of motion at the ankle. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006;7:60.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-60

Nguyen AP, Pitance L, Mahaudens P, Detrembleur C, David Y, Hall T, et al. Effects of mulligan mobilization with movement in subacute lateral ankle sprains: a pragmatic randomized trial. J Man Manip Ther 2021:1-12.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2021.1889165

Downloads

Published

2023-07-18

How to Cite

1.
Suksri T, Gaogasigam C, Boonyong S. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and minimum detectable change of visual analog scale and digital goniometer in patients with subacute unilateral lateral ankle sprain. Chula Med J [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 18 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];66(4). Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/99