Submissions

Original Articles are reports of research studies or academic investigations. Manuscripts should be organized according to the following structure:

1. Title, Author(s) and Co-authors, Institution(s), and Funding sources (if applicable)
2. Abstract in both Thai and English
3. Keywords — for indexing purposes, provided beneath the Abstract
4. Introduction
5. Materials and Methods
6. Results
7. Discussion
8. Conclusions
9. References

Note: Authors should include ethics approval (if applicable), follow the journal’s reference style, and ensure consistency in spelling and terminology across both Thai and English sections before submission.

Review Articles should provide new knowledge, summarize recent findings, or highlight topics of clinical and academic interest that may be applied in practice. They may also focus on disease analysis or commentary on disease trends. Manuscripts should be structured as follows:

1. Introduction
2. Objectives
3. Content
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. References

Note: Authors are encouraged to clearly describe the literature search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and evidence synthesis approach. References must follow the journal’s style guide.

Case Reports may be prepared in two formats: comprehensive (detailed) or concise (short). They should include the following sections, and an abstract in both Thai and English is required.

1. Introduction — Describe the significance of the case, the reason for reporting, and a brief context from relevant literature.
2. Case Presentation — Patient history, clinical findings, preliminary diagnosis, clinical course, treatment provided, and outcomes.
3. Clinical Discussion & Laboratory Findings — Discuss the meaning of clinical manifestations and laboratory results, differential diagnoses, pathophysiological reasoning, and data limitations.
4. Commentary within Scope — Highlight lessons learned, practice implications, or applications in clinical care, without overstating the available evidence.
5. Conclusions — Summarize the key takeaways and essential points for readers.
6. Abstract — Required in both Thai and English, briefly covering Background, Case, Discussion, and Conclusion.

Note: Authors must confirm informed consent from the patient or legal representative, ensure confidentiality (de-identification of personal data, appropriate use of images/lab findings), and provide evidence of approval by an Institutional Review Board (IRB/IEC) if applicable.

Special Articles may be based on professional or clinical experience, academic opinions, or scholarly investigation (experience-based, opinion pieces, narrative reviews). They allow for a flexible structure; however, to ensure clarity and quality in peer review, the following components are recommended:

1. Introduction — Provide the context, rationale, and significance of the topic.
2. Background & Related Evidence — Summarize relevant literature, prior work, or experience/case examples.
3. Main Content — Present critical opinions, analysis, or conceptual frameworks (can be divided into subtopics).
4. Implications & Recommendations — Practical applications in clinical care, health systems, or policy.
5. Limitations — Discuss the boundaries of the commentary/evidence and areas not covered.
6. Conclusions — Highlight the essential messages and take-home points for readers.
7. References — Cite relevant sources according to the journal’s reference style.

Note: If articles involve patient data or healthcare institutions, confidentiality and ethical considerations must be ensured (confidentiality & ethics). Abstracts are optional, but if provided, they should be prepared in both Thai and English.

Technique & Instrumentation articles are intended to present new surgical techniques or innovative devices/instruments. Authors must clearly describe the indications for use and the outcomes achieved.

1. Introduction — Describe the rationale, background, and objectives of the technique or instrument.
2. Technique/Instrumentation Description — Provide details of the procedure, steps of use, or structural/mechanical aspects of the device.
3. Indications — Explain the conditions or criteria appropriate for applying the technique or using the instrument.
4. Outcomes — Present the results obtained, highlighting advantages and limitations observed.
5. Discussion — Compare with existing standard methods or instruments, discussing strengths, weaknesses, and precautions.
6. Conclusions — Summarize key insights and potential implications for practice.
7. References — Cite relevant sources in accordance with the journal’s style guide.

Note: Authors are encouraged to include illustrations, diagrams, or videos (if available) to enhance clarity. Informed consent must be obtained if patient data are presented.

Letters to the Editor are intended to provide academic comments on articles already published in the journal.

1. Citation of the article under discussion — Include title, author(s), journal, year, volume, page, and DOI (if available).
2. Main Content — Provide comments, analysis, or discussion relevant to the published article. This may support or challenge the findings.
3. Suggestions or Questions — Offer constructive feedback to the author(s) or pose questions for academic exchange.
4. Conclusions — Briefly summarize the key message.
5. Additional References — If applicable, cite supporting literature according to the journal’s reference style.

Note: Letters to the Editor should be concise, clear, and focused. In general, they should not exceed 1,000 words.