The Role of Mitotic Count and Ki-67 Index in Identifying Likely Benign Salivary Gland Tumors to Avoid Overtreatment Mitotic Count and Ki-67 in Salivary Gland Tumors
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated and compared the utility of mitotic count and Ki-67 index in distinguishing benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. The primary objective was to identify optimal cut-off points for these proliferative indices to help guide diagnosis and avoid overtreatment in cases where definitive histomorphology is challenging, especially in small biopsy specimens.
Materials and Methods: A total of 88 salivary gland tumor specimens were evaluated, including 56 benign and 32 malignant cases. Mitotic count and Ki-67 index were quantified for all cases. The diagnostic performance of each marker was assessed by determining sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve the Area Under the Curve (AUC).
Results: Benign tumors exhibited consistently low mitotic counts (average < 1) and Ki-67 indices (average < 2.00%). In contrast, malignant tumors showed significantly higher values. A mitotic count ≥ 2 and a Ki-67 index ≥ 5.00% were determined as optimal cut-off points. The Ki-67 index (AUC = 0.76) demonstrated a higher sensitivity (68.80%) than the mitotic count (50.00%), performing slightly better than the mitotic count (AUC = 0.73).
Conclusion: Diagnosing benign and malignant salivary gland tumors based on morphology alone in small biopsies can be challenging. A mitotic count ≥ 2 and a Ki-67 index ≥ 5.00% are linked with malignancy, and these proliferation markers serve as valuable adjuncts to improve diagnostic accuracy and guide appropriate patient management. This approach is particularly useful in preventing overtreatment.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are copyrighted by the x may be read and used for academic purposes, such as teaching, research, or citation, with proper credit given to the author and the journal.use or modification of the articles is prohibited without permission.
statements expressed in the articles are solely the opinions of the authors.
authors are fully responsible for the content and accuracy of their articles.
other reuse or republication requires permission from the journal."
References
Bishop JA, Thompson LDR, Wakely PE, Weinreb I. Tumors of the salivary glands. Arlington: ARP Press; 2021.
Boukheris H, Curtis RE, Land CE, Dores GM. Incidence of carcinoma of the major salivary glands according to the WHO classification, 1992 to 2006: a population-based study in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(11):2899-906. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0638.
Speight PM, Barrett AW. Salivary gland tumours. Oral Dis 2002;8(5):229-40. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.02870.x.
WHO classification of tumours. Head and neck tumours. 5th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer;2024.
Mahomed Y, Meer S. Primary epithelial minor salivary gland tumors in South Africa: a 20-year review. Head Neck Pathol 2020;14(3):715-23. doi: 10.1007/s12105-019-01111-4.
Khuhaprema T, Srivatanakul P, Attasara P, Sriplung. H, Wiangnon S, Sumitsawan Y. Cancer in Thailand. Bangkok: National Cancer Institute; 2010.
Bell RB, Dierks EJ, Homer L, Potter BE. Management and outcome of patients with malignant salivary gland tumors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63(7):917-28. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.03.006.
Dulguerov P, Marchal F, Lehmann W. Postparotidectomy facial nerve paralysis: possible etiologic factors and results with routine facial nerve monitoring. Laryngoscope 1999;109(5):754-62. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199905000-00014.
Voz ML, Aström AK, Kas K, Mark J, Stenman G, Van de Ven WJ. The recurrent translocation t(5;8)(p13;q12) in pleomorphic adenomas results in upregulation of PLAG1 gene expression under control of the LIFR promoter. Oncogene 1998;16(11):1409-16. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201660.
Gerdes J, Lemke H, Baisch H, Wacker HH, Schwab U, Stein H. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation-associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. J Immunol 1984;133(4):1710-5. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.133.4.1710.
Yamane T. Statistics, An Introductory Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row; 1967.
Ellis PS, Whitehead R. Mitosis counting--a need for reappraisal. Hum Pathol 1981;12(1):3-4. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(81)80235-3.
Ibrahim A, Lashen A, Toss M, Mihai R, Rakha E. Assessment of mitotic activity in breast cancer: revisited in the digital pathology era. J Clin Pathol 2022;75(6):365-72. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207742.
Meuten DJ, Moore FM, George JW. Mitotic count and the field of view area: time to standardize. Vet Pathol 2016;53(1):7-9. doi: 10.1177/0300985815593349.
Scolyer RA, Thompson JF. Mitotic rate in melanoma should be recorded as the number of mitoses per mm2 (not per high power field): surgeons tell your pathologists! Am J Surg 2013;206(1):142-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.11.012.
van Diest PJ, van der Wall E, Baak JP. Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review. J Clin Pathol 2004;57(7):675-81. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2003.010777.
van Diest PJ, Baak JP, Matze-Cok P, Wisse-Brekelmans EC, van Galen CM, Kurver PH, et al. Reproducibility of mitosis counting in 2,469 breast cancer specimens: results from the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project. Hum Pathol 1992;23(6):603-7. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90313-r.
Biesterfeld S. Methodische Aspekte bei der standardisierten Beurteilung der mitotischen Aktivität von Tumorgeweben [Methodologic aspects of a standardized evaluation of mitotic activity in tumor tissues]. Pathologe 1997;18(6):439-44. doi: 10.1007/s002920050239.
Kazanceva A, Groma V, Smane L, Kornevs E, Teibe U. Proliferative potential in benign mixed salivary gland tumors and its value in primary and recurrent neoplasms. Stomatologija 2011;13(2):35-41.
Suzzi MV, Alessi A, Bertarelli C, Cancellieri A, Procaccio L, Dall’olio D, et al. Prognostic relevance of cell proliferation in major salivary gland carcinomas. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2005;25(3):161-8.