Walking Without Sight: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Walkway Accessibility Among Visually Impaired Individuals in Thailand

Authors

  • Chadakan Yan Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • Namtip Ruchatachat Mahidol University International Demonstration School (MUIDS)
  • Kanrutai Jarottammarat Division of AIDS and STIs, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  • Chomphunut Singmanee School of Nursing, Panyapiwat Institute of Management,Thailand

Keywords:

walkway accessibility, visual impairment, built environment, disability inclusion, Thailand

Abstract

Accessible pedestrian infrastructure is essential for ensuring safe mobility, autonomy, and social participation among individuals with visual impairments. However, empirical data on how this population perceives walkway accessibility in Thailand remain limited. This study aimed to assess perceived walkway accessibility among visually impaired Thai adults and identify associated demographic, environmental, and policy-related factors. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from May to June 2025 among 495 Thai adults (≥18 years) with self-reported visual impairment, recruited via purposive sampling from disability organizations, clinics, and online platforms. A structured questionnaire assessed perceived walkway accessibility using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Very Poor to 5 = Very Good), as well as walkway usage, perceived safety, assistive technology use, environmental barriers, and satisfaction with government support. Descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression (univariable and multivariable) were used for analysis.

 Participants had a mean age of 23.07 ± 7.51 years; 58.2% were male. The mean accessibility rating was 2.96 ± 0.47, with 60% reporting infrequent walkway use. Commonly reported barriers included uneven surfaces (65.3%), physical obstacles (57.0%), and absence of tactile paving (56.2%). In univariable analysis, older age, longer impairment duration, greater severity, and frequent walkway use were associated with lower perceived accessibility, while policy awareness and presence of audio signals had positive accessibility, while policy awareness and presence of audio signals had positive associations. In multivariable analysis, higher perceived safety showed a strong positive association with better accessibility (mOR = 628.58–6920.12; p < 0.001), as did greater satisfaction with government support (mOR = 16.56–78.06; p < 0.01). Conversely, moderate impairment, male gender, regular walkway use, and assistive technology use were negatively associated. Environmental factors were not significant after adjustment. These findings highlight the critical role of perceived safety and public support in shaping accessibility perceptions, emphasizing the need for inclusive urban design and responsive policymaking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Liao Y, Lin Y, Hsu CL, Chen HM. Examining the accessibility of public transportation for people with visual impairments: A case study of Taipei Metro. Sustainability 2021;13(2):654. doi:10.3390/su13020654

Lu J, Siu KW, Xu P. A comparative study of tactile paving design standards in different countries. [Internet] 2008 [cited 2025 Jul 19]. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4730674/metrics#metrics

Saha D, Jana A, Ghosh A. Urban accessibility for persons with disabilities in developing countries: A review. J Urban Manag 2019;8(1):89-101. doi:10.1016/j.jum.2019.04.001

Prasertsubpakij D, Nitivattananon V. Evaluating accessibility to Bangkok Metro Systems using multi-dimensional criteria across user groups. IATSS research. 2012 ;36(1):56-65. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.02.003

Choibamroong T, Angkananon K. Accessibility Barriers in the Second-Tier Tourism Cities of Thailand for People with Visual Impairments. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites. 2022;45:1683-92. doi:10.30892/gtg.454spl18-989

Sawadsri S. The social construction of disability in Thailand: A critical discourse analysis [dissertation]. Leeds: University of Leeds; 2018.

Dakopoulos D, Bourbakis N. A survey of smart canes and mobility aids for the visually impaired. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 2010;40(5):515–27. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2021255

Lahav O, Mioduser D. Mobile applications for people with visual impairments: A review. J Vis Impair Blind. 2018;112(4):361–72. doi: 10.1177/0145482X18775338

Hersh MA. Assistive technology for the visually impaired. Springer; 2018.

Golledge RG. Geography and the disabled. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 1993;83(1):1–13. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.00276

Ranasinghe T. The visually impaired risk colliding with the safety barrier if they use these textured paving blocks. ResearchGate [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-visually-impaired-risk-colliding-with-the-safety-barrier-if-they-use-these-textured_fig8_238088156

Matthews S, Hibberd J, Speakman S. The impact of street accessibility on travel and independence for disabled people. White Rose Research Online [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2025 Jul 19]. Available from: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/101881/1/matthews%20hibberd%20and%20speakman%20final.pdf

United Nations in Thailand. More must be done for those with a disability [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jul 19]. Available from: https://thailand.un.org/en/164550-more-must-be-done-those-disability

Inclusive City Maker. Blind and Visually Impaired Pedestrians: What Are Their Difficulties When Crossing the Street? [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.inclusivecitymaker.com/blind-visually-impaired-pedestrians-difficulties-crossing/

Chidiac SE, Reda MA, Marjaba GE.. Accessibility of the Built Environment for People with Sensory Disabilities—Review Quality and Representation of Evidence. buildings 2024;14(3):707. doi: 10.3390/buildings14030707

Jonnalagedda A, Pei L, Saxena S, Wu M, Min BC, Teves E, et al. Enhancing the safety of visually impaired travelers in and around transit stations. [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/2014/12/NavPalTechReport2014Final.pdf

Barasche-Berdah D, Paltiel O, Raz R. Active lifestyle and mobility of adults with vision impairment: a multiphase mixed-methods study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023;20(19):6839. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20196839

Somnuxpong S, Wiwatwongwana R. The ability to support accessible tourism in Chiang Mai, Thailand. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure. 2020;9(1):1-6.

Taweebanjongsin W, Wongsawad W, Janwarapa N, Wichitkamnerdkun S, Songpromtip T, Jaijumnong S. Visual Performance After Visual Aids Usage Among Visual Impaired Persons in Metta Pracharak Hospital (Wat Rai Khing), Thailand. Journal of The Department of Medical Services. 2025; 50(2):64-72. [in Thai]

Ma Y, Gu X, Zhang W, Hu S, Liu H, Zhao J, Chen S. Evaluating the effectiveness of crosswalk tactile paving on street-crossing behavior: A field trial study for people with visual impairment. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2021;163. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106420.

National Statistical Office. Survey of the disabled in Thailand [Internet]. Bangkok: National Statistical Office; 2017 [cited 2025 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.nso.go.th/

Beheshti M, Naeimi T, Hudson TE, Feng C, Mongkolwat P, Riewpaiboon W, Seiple W, Vedanthan R, Rizzo JR. A Smart Service System for Spatial Intelligence and Onboard Navigation for Individuals with Visual Impairment (VIS4ION Thailand): Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial of visually impaired students at the Ratchasuda College, Thailand. Trials. 2023 Mar 7;24(1):169.

Price M, Lewis M. The reinvention of cultural geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1993; 83(1):1-7. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01920.x

Nophaket N, Tirapas C, Songpetchmongkol W. The Walking Bangkapi: Inclusive pedestrian network’s integrated design and implementation study on Bangkok’s emerging transportation district. Journal of Architectural/Planning Research and Studies (JARS). 2024 Jan 30;21(2):329-44. doi:10.56261/jars.v21.263103

Skynet Technologies. Thailand's Persons with Disabilities Empowerment Act: Driving Digital Accessibility and Inclusion! [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 19]. Available from: https://www.skynettechnologies.com/blog/digital-accessibility-inclusion-in-thailand

Downloads

Published

2025-09-22

How to Cite

Yan, C., Ruchatachat, N. ., Jarottammarat, K. ., & Singmanee, C. (2025). Walking Without Sight: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Walkway Accessibility Among Visually Impaired Individuals in Thailand. Community Health Development Quarterly Khon Kaen University, 13(2), 129–154. retrieved from https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CHDMD_KKU/article/view/6679

Issue

Section

Original Article