The outcome of early versus late tracheostomy in neurosurgery patients: A preliminary study of open RCT
Keywords:
early tracheostomy, late tracheostomy, neurosurgery patient, ventilator-associated pneumoniaAbstract
Background: Tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure and necessary in patients predicted to use long-term mechanical ventilation. Many neurosurgery patients need prolonged mechanical ventilation but there is controversial evidence to guide clinicians regarding the optimal time of the procedure.
Objective: The primary objective was to compare length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation support duration, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and mortality rate between early tracheotomy (within 7 days after intubation) and late tracheostomy (more than 7 days after intubation). Whereas, secondary objective was to identify tracheostomy related complications
Patients and Methods: A randomized controlled trial conducted between June 2014 and September 2015 in Maharaj Nakhon Chiang Mai hospital. After informed consent, fifty-six eligible neurosurgery patients, whom intubated more than 72 hours and assessed for tracheostomy by clinical physicians were randomized into early and late tracheotomy group, 28 patients in each group. Primary outcomes, length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation support duration, ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality rate, and related complications were measured. The analysis was by intention-to-treat.
Results: In the early group, 28 patients, tracheostomy was performed after seven days in 6 patients (21.4%). Average age and tracheostomy day after intubation were 54.9 ± 20.9 years and 5.9 ± 2.0 days respectively. In the late tracheostomy group, 28 patients, average age and tracheostomy day after intubation were 63.2 ± 12.9 years and 14 ± 3.9 days respectively. Baseline characteristic was not significantly different between the groups. The average length of ICU stay in early and late tracheostomy groups were 14 and 21 days. The hazard ratio was 0.455 (p-value = 0.007), which showed that ICU discharge rate in early group was significantly 2.2 times earlier than in late tracheostomy group. Accordingly, mechanical ventilation support duration in early and late tracheostomy groups were 9 and 18 days. The hazard ratio was 0.22 (p-value < 0.001), which showed that the mechanical ventilator wean-off rate in early group was significantly 4.55 times faster than in late tracheostomy group. Ventilator-associated pneumonia were identified in 15 patients, 6 (21.4%) and 9 (32.1%) patients in early and late group (p-value = 0.55). The mortality rate in early and late group were 10.7% and 17.8%, respectively (p-value = 0.71). There was no tracheostomy complication that occurred during the study.
Conclusion: In neurosurgery patients, early tracheostomy decreases length of ICU stay and mechanical ventilator support duration significantly but no statistical difference in ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality rate.
Downloads
References
Rizk EB, Patel AS, Stetter CM, Chinchilli VM, Cockroft KM. Impact of tracheostomy timing on outcome after severe head injury. Neurocritical care. 2011;15(3):481-9.
Tong CC, Kleinberger AJ, Paolino J, Altman KW. Tracheotomy timing and outcomes in the critically ill. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery. 2012;147(1):44-51.
Choi HJ, Paeng SH, Kim ST, Lee KS, Kim MS, Jung YT. The effectiveness of early tracheostomy (within at least 10 days) in cervical spinal cord injury patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013;54(3):220-4.
Griffiths J, Barber VS, Morgan L, Young JD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the timing of tracheostomy in adult patients undergoing artificial ventilation. BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1243.
Sugerman HJ, Wolfe L, Pasquale MD, Rogers FB, O’Malley KF, Knudson M, et al. Multicenter, randomized, prospective trial of early tracheostomy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1997;43(5):741-7.
Saffle JR, Morris SE, Edelman L. Early tracheostomy does not improve outcome in burn patients. The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 2002;23(6):431-8.
Blot F, Similowski T, Trouillet J-L, Chardon P, Korach J-M, Costa M-A, et al. Early tracheotomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in unselected severely ill ICU patients. Intensive care med. 2008;34(10):1779-87.
Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, Rowan K, Collaborators T. Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309(20):2121-9.
Bouderka MA, Fakhir B, Bouaggad A, Hmamouchi B, Hamoudi D, Harti A. Early tracheostomy versus prolonged endotracheal intubation in severe head injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2004;57(2):251-4.
Rajbanshi JN, Yadav AK, Thapa DK, Karki KT. Types of Neurosurgical Patients Requiring TracheostomyInstitution Based Study. EGNeuro. 2020;2(1):27-9.
Pinheiro BdV, Tostes RdO, Brum CI, Carvalho EV, Pinto SPS, Oliveira JCAd. Early versus late tracheostomy in patients with acute severe brain injury. J Bras Pneumol. 2010;36:84-91.
Jeon Y-T, Hwang J-W, Lim Y-J, Lee S-Y, Woo K-I, Park H-P. Effect of tracheostomy timing on clinical outcome in neurosurgical patients: early versus late tracheostomy. Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology. 2014;26(1):22-6.
Foundation BT, on Neurotrauma JS, Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, Hammond FFM, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IV. Infection prophylaxis. J neurotrauma. 2007;24:S26-S31.
Centers for disease control and prevention. CDC/ NHSN Protocol Corrections, Clarification, and Additions.2013;6-1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are copyrighted by the x may be read and used for academic purposes, such as teaching, research, or citation, with proper credit given to the author and the journal.use or modification of the articles is prohibited without permission.
statements expressed in the articles are solely the opinions of the authors.
authors are fully responsible for the content and accuracy of their articles.
other reuse or republication requires permission from the journal."