Volumetric kinetic assessment in dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) of breast cancer: A new method for evaluation of whole tumor enhancing pattern

Authors

  • Jatuporn Chayakulkheeree Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Krittika Tongin Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Darunee Boonjunwetwat Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Breast MRI, breast cancer, volumetric kinetic assessment, color coded breast MRI

Abstract

Background: At present, dynamic contrast enhancement-MRI (DCE-MRI) has an immense role in the diagnosis and evaluation of the extent of breast cancer. As for diagnosis, evaluation of patterns of kinetic enhancement in dynamic contrast studies is performed after gadolinium injection. Since each breast cancer has internal pathophysiological variety, the kinetic enhancement patterns are supposed to be varied within each mass as well.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and additional value of volumetric analysis of kinetic enhancement patterns on DCE-MRI in evaluating breast cancer in Thai patients.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 52 women, and 67 lesions which were histologically proven breast cancers, using software of breast MRI and generating 3D volumetric voxels covering the total tumor volume in DCE-MRI performed between January 2014 and December 2017. Measurement of enhancement patterns was categorized by software into the percentage of part of the tumor which enhanced in each pattern. Consequently, percentages of enhancement in different type were collected and allocated into type I (persistent), type II (plateau), and type III (washout) enhancements. Analysis of the kinetic pattern was done together with subgroup analysis of each type of tumor (IDC, DCIS, and other subtypes of breast cancer), as well as tumor grades.

Results: The mean percentages of enhancement pattern in kinetic assessment by 3D voxels of tumor volume showed the most common type I enhancement (72%), followed by type III enhancement (14.3%) and type II enhancement (13.7%). Subgroup analysis showed similar higher type I enhancement in both IDC (68.3%) and DCIS (81.3%). However, there were slightly higher suspicious malignant patterns of enhancement (31.7% type II and 18.7% type III enhancements) in IDC than DCIS, as well as in high tumor grade (grade 3) than low tumor grade (grade 1) (37% type II and 30.7% type III enhancements), but there were no significant differences.

Conclusion: Volumetric analysis showed heterogeneity of kinetic curve enhancement patterns inside each tumor. That means each tumor has a variety of enhancement patterns in itself and dissimilarity with others. The majority of patterns were found as type I enhancement which was not particular for malignant, whereas there was only 28% with suspicious kinetic enhancement patterns (type II and type III enhancements). The slightly higher suspicious malignant patterns of enhancement (type II and III enhancements) in IDC more than DCIS along with high tumor grade was observed, deprived of statistical significance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Leong SP, Shen ZZ, Liu TJ, Agarwal G, Tajima T, Paik NS, et al. Is breast cancer the same disease in Asian and Western countries? World J Surg 2010;34: 2308-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0683-1

Cheng YC, Wu NY, Ko JS, Lin PW, Lin WC, Juang SJ, et al. Breast cancers detected by breast MRI screening and ultrasound in asymptomatic Asian women: 8 years of experience in Taiwan. Oncology 2012;82:98-107. https://doi.org/10.1159/000335958

Partridge AH, Goldhirsch A, Gelber S, Gelber RD. Breast cancer in younger woman. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK, editors. Disease of the breast. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott William & Wikins;2010. p.1073-82.

American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system atlas (BI-RADS atlas). 5th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.

Mandato Y, Porto A, Granata V, Fabozzi G, Palma G, Filice S, et al. Breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI): a semiquantitative method in type II kinetic curve assessment. Poster presented at European Congress of Radiology (ECR) 2011, Poster ECR 2011/C-1011.

Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Coady AM, Turnbull LW, Horsman A. Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. Br J Radiol 1996;69:1009-16.

https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-69-827-1009

Stoutjesdijk MJ, Futterer JJ, Boetes C, van Die LE, Jager G, Barentsz JO. Variability in the description of morphologic and contrast enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005;40:355-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000163741.16718.3e

Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-10. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap38101

Menezes GL, van den Bosch MA, Postma EL, El Sharouni MA, Verkooijen HM, van Diest PJ, et al. Invasive ductolobular carcinoma of the breast:spectrum of mammographic, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings correlated with proportion of the lobular component. Springerplus 2013;2:621.

https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-621

Lee AH, Dublin EA, Bobrow LG, Poulsom R. Invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast show distinct patterns of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis. J Pathol 1998;185:394-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199808)185:4<394::AID-PATH117>3.0.CO;2-S

Kim JA, Son EJ, Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Kwak JY, et al. MRI findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic characteristics compared according to lesion type and histopathologic factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1450-6. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5027

Jansen SA, Newstead GM, Abe H, Shimauchi A, Schmidt RA, Karczmar GS. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: kinetic and morphologic MR characteristics compared with mammographic appearance and nuclear grade. Radiology 2007;245:684-91. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2453062061

Vag T, Baltzer PA, Dietzel M, Benndorf M, Gajda M,Camara O, et al. Kinetic characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic breast MRI using computer-assisted analysis. Acta Radiol 2010;51:955-61. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841851.2010.508171

Leong LC, Gombos EC, Jagadeesan J, Fook-Chong SM. MRI kinetics with volumetric analysis in correlation with hormonal receptor subtypes and histologic grade of invasive breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:W348-56. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11486

Downloads

Published

2023-07-20

How to Cite

1.
Chayakulkheeree J, Tongin K, Boonjunwetwat D. Volumetric kinetic assessment in dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) of breast cancer: A new method for evaluation of whole tumor enhancing pattern. Chula Med J [Internet]. 2023 Jul. 20 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];64(1). Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/177