Accuracy of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted fineneedle aspiration for diagnosis and management of BI-RADS 4 lesion

Authors

  • Somchanin Pipatpajong Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Panida Wongsansuk Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Keywords:

Fine-needle aspiration, BI-RADS 4, accuracy

Abstract

Background: Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 4 lesions are in the category of suspicion for malignancy which has to be managed with core needle biopsy as specified in the standard guidelines. Nonetheless, at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, an ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is performed in some cases of BI-RADS 4 lesions because it has been considered a simple and cost-effective tool for managing breast lesions in a previous study.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of an ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and management of BI-RADS 4 lesions.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 251 female patients with BI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent an ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted FNA, together with a subsequent procedure of either surgical biopsy or follow-up imaging for at least 2 years at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from January 2011 to December 2013. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the study data were evaluated. Also, the underestimation rate of unsatisfactory samples (C1) was calculated.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted FNA were 72.73% (95% CI:67.22 - 78.24%), 98.07% (95% CI:96.36 - 99.77%), 88.89% (95% CI:85.0 - 92.78%) and 94.42% (95% CI: 91.58 - 97.26%) respectively. Sixteen patients with discordant lesions between FNA cytology and surgical pathology were found; 4 of them (1.9%) were false positives and 12 (27.3%) were false negatives. Among 71 patients with unsatisfactory samples (C1), 67 cases (94.4%) showed benign results, while 4 cases (5.6%) showed malignant results.

Conclusion: An ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted FNA is a reliable diagnostic tool for BI-RADS 4 lesions. However, there are some limitations that may cause false negatives, especially in the case of a very small lesions, such as an inexperienced performer along with other uncontrollable factors e.g. the heterogeneity type of a tumor. Therefore, subjects should be properly selected to prevent an error.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition. Radiographics 2016;36:623-39. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150178

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis version 1.2017- June 2, 2017 [Internet]. June 2, 2017 [cited 2017 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast-screening.pdf.

Kanchanabat B, Kanchanapitak P, Thanapongsathorn W, Manomaiphiboon A. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis and management of palpable breast mass. Aust N Z J Surg 2000;70:791-4.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01975.x

Nagar S, Iacco A, Riggs T, Kestenberg W, Keidan R. An analysis of fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy in clinically palpable breast lesions: a report on the predictive values and a cost comparison. Am J Surg 2012;204:193-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.10.018

Yu YH, Wei W, Liu JL. Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2012;12:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-41

Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Caudry DJ, Sneige N, Frable WJ, Berg WA, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology 2001;219:785-92. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01jn28785

Mendoza P, Lacambra M, Tan PH, Tse GM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast: the nonmalignant categories. Patholog Res Int 2011;2011:547580. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/547580

Omi Y, Yamamoto T, Okamoto T, Nishikawa T, Shibata N. Fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of the intraductal breast papillary lesions. World J Pathol 2013;2:64-70.

Nassar A, Conners AL, Celik B, Jenkins SM, Smith CY, Hieken TJ. Radial scar/Complex Sclerosing Lesions: a clinicopathologic correlation study from a single institution. Ann Diagn Pathol 2015;19:24-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2014.12.003

Downloads

Published

2023-07-20 — Updated on 2023-10-26

Versions

How to Cite

1.
Pipatpajong S, Wongsansuk P. Accuracy of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted fineneedle aspiration for diagnosis and management of BI-RADS 4 lesion. Chula Med J [Internet]. 2023 Oct. 26 [cited 2024 Oct. 12];64(1). Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/CMJ/article/view/178