The study of Post–large–scale disaster disease surveillance in Thailand

Authors

  • Rapeepan Dejpichai Office of Disease Prevention and Control Region 8, Udon Thani, Department of Disease Control

Keywords:

tsunami, post– large– scale flooding, evaluation, surveillance, communicable disease surveillance, disaster, Thailand

Abstract

Background: Since the outbreaks and epidemic-prone diseases occurred after large-scale Disaster, Thailand Department of Disease Control had set up the disease surveillance system for these events such as tsunami in 2004 and large-scale Flooding in 2011. During these two disaster periods, the Department of Disease Control established the post-tsunami active disease surveillance and surveillance for post-large-scale flooding for monitoring trends of outbreak-prone diseases for rapid disease control response. The objectives of this study were to study the post–tsunami active disease surveillance and post– large– scale disaster surveillance and to provide the recommendations for improvement the surveillance for disaster in the future.
Methods: The methods of this documentary research were 1) review literature about post–tsunami in 2004–2005 and post–large-scale flooding disease surveillance in 2011–2012, disease prevention and control, public health emergency management, public health emergency management in disease outbreak issue, the study of post– disaster (including tsunami and post–large–scale flooding) disease prevention and control and tsunami in Thailand documents 2) collect the data and analyze all gathering data using thematic analysis, according to various qualitative attributes of the surveillance system and 3) summarize and discuss the results in order to provide the recommendation of post–disaster disease prevention and control management.
Results: Simplicity, flexibility, usefulness, and acceptability, the attributes of the disease surveillance were good, but the stability was poor.
Recommendations: The Thai Department of Disease Control should 1) evaluate of cost-effectiveness and efficiency of the surveillance, 2) prepare the suitable post-disaster surveillance for every post-disaster event, 3) set up the post-disaster disease control preparedness plan in the public health emergency plan, and 4) collect data both soft and hard copies systematically, completely, and safely for analysis effectively in the future.

References

CDC. Early Warning Disease Surveillance after a Flood Emergency-Pakistan, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2012 [cited 2017 Jan 15];61:49. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtmV/mm6149a2.htm

WHO. Disease Early Warning System Flooding Response in Pakistan Operational Guidance. 2010 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.who.int/hac/crises/pak/pakistan _operational_guidance_flooding_august2010.pdf

tsunami2004.net [Internet]. Tsunami 2004 Facts and Figures. [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.tsunami2004.net/tsunami-2004-facts/

Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation. Effect of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami on Thailand. [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.disaster.go.th/news01/12_47/news_after_shock_34.pdf

Isidore K Kouadio, Syed Aljunid, Taro Kamigaki, Karen Hammad, Hitoshi Oshitani. Expert reviews: infectious diseases following natural disasters: prevention and control measures. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 2012;10(1):95-104.

Watson J, Gayer M, Conneolly MA. Epidemic Risk after Disasters. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(9):1468.

WHO. Flooding and communicable diseases fact sheet. Weekly epidemiological record. 2005;80(3):21-28. [cited 2017 Jan 15] Available from http://www.who.int/wer/2005 en/wer8003.pdf

WHO. Media centre: Tsunami recovery process focuses on long-term health capacity development. 2014 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2005/pr30searo/en/#

Floret N, Viel JF, Mauny F, Hoen B, Piarroux R. Negligible risk for epidemics after geophysical disasters. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12(4):543-8.

Ahern M, R Sari Kovats, Wilkinson P, Few R, Matthies F. Global Health Impacts of Floods: Epidemiologic Evidence. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:36-46. Doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxi004

Noji EK, Toole MJ. The historical development of public health responses to disaster. Disasters. 1997;21:366-76.

Iwata O, Oki TH, Ishiki A, et al. Infection surveillance after a natural disaster: lessons learnt from the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:784-9.

Doung-ngern P, Vatanprasan T, Chungpaibulpatana J, et al. Infections and treatment of wounds in survivors of the 2004 Tsunami in Thailand. Int Wound J. 2005;6(5):347-54.

WHO. Communicable diseases following natural disasters: risk assessment and priority interventions. 2006 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.who.int/diseasecontrol_emergencies/publications/who_cds_ntd_dce_2006.4/en/

Western KA. Epidemiologic Surveillance after Natural Disaster: Scientific Publication No.420. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization;1982.

Bureau of Epidemiology. Concept of Adaptation of Epidemiological Surveillance. 2014 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.boe.moph.go.th/files/meeting/506.pdf

Bureau of Epidemiology. Standard and Guideline for Surveillance and Rapid Response Team. 2012 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.boe.moph.go.th/files/report/20121130 _52632501.pdf

สำนักระบาดวิทยา กรมควบคุมโรค. รายงานผลการศึกษาระบบเฝ้าระวังโรคเชิงรุกภายหลังเหตุการณ์คลื่นยักษ์สึนามิในพื้นที่ 6 จังหวัดภาคใต้ ประเทศไทย พ.ศ. 2547-2548. นนทบุรี; 2548.

Rapeepan Dejpichai. A tsunami after-Action Report: Active Disease Surveillance in Tsunami Affected areas, Southern Thailand, December 2004-February 2005. Master essay. University of Pittsburgh. 2014.

สำนักระบาดวิทยา กรมควบคุมโรค. โรคติดต่อกับอุทกภัย: สถานการณ์และการเฝ้าระวัง. 2554 [สืบค้นวันที่ 15 ม.ค. 2560]. เข้าถึงได้จาก http://164.115.25.123/flood/doc/riskassessment_shelter_in_flooding.pdf

WHO South-East Asia Region. Emergency Preparedness and Response: From Lessons to Action. Report of the Regional Consultation Bali, Indonesia 27-28 June 2006. 2007.

CDC. Framework for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems for Early Detection of Outbreaks Recommendations from the CDC Working Group. [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/preview/mmwrhtmV/IT5305 a1.htm

CDC. Guidelines for Evaluating Surveillance Systems. [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00001769.htm

CDC. Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems Recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtmV/r5013a1.htm

CDC. Overview of Evaluating Surveillance Systems. 2013 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/fetp/training_modules/12/eval-surv-sys_fieldg_final_09262013.pdf

CDC. CDC Coffee Break: Streamlining the Evaluation of Public Health Surveillance Systems. 2012 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/dhdsp/pubs/docs/cb_ may_8_2012.pdf

WHO. International Health Regulation Frequently Asked Questions. Geneva: Office of Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response; 2005 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from http://www.who.int/csr/ihr/howtheywork /faq/en/index.html

กรมป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัย กระทรวงมหาดไทย พระราชบัญญัติป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัย พ.ศ. 2550. 2550 [สืบค้นวันที่ 15 ม.ค. 2560]. เข้าถึงได้จาก http://122.155.1.145/inner.LRI21-6.65/download/menu853/432.11

คณะกรรมการป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัยแห่งชาติ. แผนการ ป้องกันและบรรเทาสาธารณภัยแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2558. 2558 [สืบค้น วันที่ 15 ม.ค. 2560]. เข้าถึงได้จาก http://122.155.1.143/upload/download/file attach/55acacb4f1f7c.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-06-02

How to Cite

Dejpichai, . R. (2024). The study of Post–large–scale disaster disease surveillance in Thailand. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report, 48(38), 593–600. retrieved from https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/WESR/article/view/2266

Issue

Section

Original article