Investigation of Influenza Outbreak in Healthcare Workers, Hospital A, Buriram Province, Thailand, August – October 2010
Keywords:
Influenza, outbreak, vaccine effectiveness, healthcare workers, hand washing, ThailandAbstract
Background: On 6 October 2010, the Bureau of Epidemiology was notified of influenza-like illness (ILI) outbreak in healthcare workers in ER and OPD of Hospital A, Buriram Province. An investigation was conducted to confirm a diagnosis, identify risks factors of ILI and evaluate the effectiveness of the 2010 trivalent influenza vaccine in this outbreak.
Method: Influenza surveillance reports and medical records were reviewed. Active case finding was conducted in all healthcare workers. An acute respiratory illness (ARI) case was defined as a person who worked in Hospital A and developed at least two of the following symptoms: fever, cough, rhinorrhea and sore throat between 12 August and 31 October 2010. A confirmed influenza case was an ARI case who had a throat swab positive for influenza by RT-PCR. A retrospective cohort study and an environmental survey were carried out in ER and OPD. An ILI case was a person who worked in ER and OPD of Hospital A and developed fever with cough and/or sore throat between 12 August and 31 October 2010. Risk factors for ILI were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses and presented by using crude risk ratio (RR) and adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI).
Results: Of 390 healthcare workers in Hospital A, 137 (35.2%) met the case definitions, including 134 ARI cases and 3 confirmed influenza cases (i.e., a case of influenza A H1N1 2009 case and 2 cases of influenza A H3N2). The median age of cases was 32 years (rang: 20 - 60 years) and male to female ratio was 1:5. The highest attack rate was observed in OPD (59.1%), followed by Pharmacy Department (55.2%) and ER (45.0%). The index case worked in Pharmacy Department and she developed symptoms after having close contacts with her son whom was diagnosed with pneumonia. The durations of viral shedding time in two H3N2 influenza cases were 8 and 9 days in the 2 vaccinated nurses. Significant protective factor was hand washing (adjusted odds ratio = 0.161, 95% CI = 0.034, 0.748). The effectiveness of the 2010 trivalent influenza vaccine for preventing ILI was 41.6 % (95% CI = 7.1%, 63.3%). Environmental survey revealed close contact of hospital personnel in a crowded condition and air conditioning area in the hospital.
Conclusion: An outbreak of laboratory - confirmed influenza A H1N1 2009 and influenza A H3N2 occurred among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital. The highest attack rates were in OPD, ER and Pharmacy Department. Hand washing was a significant protective factor while the effectiveness of the 2010 trivalent influenza vaccine was modest.
References
กู้ศักดิ์ บำรุงเสนา.รายงานการสอบสวนโรคไข้หวัดใหญ่ในบุคลากรทางการแพทย์ โรงพยาบาลแห่งหนึ่งจังหวัดสงขลา พฤษภาค - มิถุนายน 2548 (เอกสารอัดสำเนา). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักระบาดวิทยา กรมควบคุมโรค กระทรวงสาธารณสุข; 2548.
วาธี สิทธิ อัจฉรา ตั้งสถาพรพงษ์ ศณิษา สันตยากร. การ สอบสวนการระบาดของโรคไข้หวัดใหญ่สายพันธุ์ใหม่ ชนิดเอ (H1N1) ในโรงพยาบาลตติยภูมิ จังหวัดปทุมธานี มีนาคม 2553. รายงานการเฝ้าระวังทางระบาดวิทยาประจำสัปดาห์ 2553; 41: 405-11.
Paul W, Robert BC. Influenza viruses In: Alferd SE, Richard AK, editors. Viral infections of humans. 4th ed. New York: Epidemiology and Control; 1997. p. 473-5.
Ling LM, Chow AL, Lye DC, et al. Effects of early oseltamivir therapy on viral shedding in 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) viral infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Apr 1; 50(7): 963-9.
หิรัญวุฒิ แพร่คุณธรรม, นิรุตน์ รุ่งสวัสดิ์, จินตนา เกษม. ผลของวัคซีนป้องกันไข้หวัดใหญ่สายพันธุ์ใหม่ (H1N1) 2009 ต่อการระบาดของโรคไข้หวัดใหญ่ในเรือนจำแห่งหนึ่งจังหวัดนครสวรรค์ เดือนสิงหาคม - กันยายน 2553. รายงานการเฝ้า ระวังทางระบาดวิทยาประจำสัปดาห์ 2554; 42: 225-32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Responsibility and Copyright
1. Author Responsibility and Editorial Disagreement
The content and data in all articles published in WESR are the direct opinions and responsibility of the article authors, and the Journal's Editorial Board is not necessarily in agreement with, or jointly responsible for, them.
2. Copyright and Referencing
All articles, data, content, figures, etc., published in WESR are considered the copyright of the academic journal. If any individual or entity wishes to disseminate all or any part of the published material, appropriate citation of the article is required.

