Investigation of Brucellosis among Livestock and Humans, Songkhla Province, Thailand, 2011
Keywords:
brucellosis, cattle, goat, sheep, human, ThailandAbstract
Background: Brucellosis impacts both human health and farm economics. Veterinary laboratory surveillance 2009 to 2011 detected six outbreaks of bovine brucellosis in Songkhla province. Veterinary and public health authorities investigated to determine scope of the outbreak and conducted active case finding for recommending preventive measures.
Methods: A descriptive study was conducted at farm X and a nearby public grazing range. By simple random sampling, serum was collected from 271 cattle, 780 goats, 79 sheep and 39 farm workers at farm X and 64 nearby cattle. Cases were defined by positive Rose Bengal Test among livestock and by both IgG and IgM brucellosis titers > 1:30 and > 1:20 by ELISA among humans. We interviewed farm workers about occupational risk and farm management.
Results: Herd prevalence of brucellosis among cattle was 12% at farm X and 25% at nearby farms. Sheep (1.3%) and goats (0%) prevalence was low. Cattle was older than 3 years old had a higher risk to be detected seropositive than in younger cattle (PR 2.96, 95%CI 0.94-9.38). The possible risk factors were hypothesized including a transmission of brucellosis between nearby herds through sharing some pastures during rotational grazing, an inappropriate management in paturient animals and using natural mating. No human cases were found. 76% of farm workers had a good practice by using personnel protective equipment.
Conclusions: Cattle in farm X and nearby farms had high prevalence of brucellosis, but we found little evidence of interspecies transmission. We recommended monthly screening, culling affected animals, appropriate parturition management and fence repair. Post–intervention, bovine brucellosis has decreased at farm X to 1%.
References
Hoover D, Friedlander A. Brucellosis. In: Zajtchuk R, editor. Textbook of Military Medicine: Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Washington, DC: US Department of the Army, Surgeon General, and the Borden Institute. 1997. p. 513-21.
World Health Organization. Brucellosis in humans and animals. [cited 20 March 2012]. Available from: http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/Brucellosis.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food Guidelines for coordinated human and animal brucellosis surveillance. 2003.
ธีรศักดิ์ ชักนํา. โรคบรูเซลโลสิส. ใน: ภาสกร อัครเสวี, บรรณาธิการ. สรุปรายงานการเฝ้าระวังโรคประจําปี 2552. พิมพ์ ครั้งที่ 1. กรุงเทพฯ: องค์การสงเคราะห์ทหารผ่านศึกในพระบรม- ราชูปภัมภ์; 2552. หน้า 71.
สถาบันสุขภาพสัตว์แห่งชาติ. รายงานประจําปี 2552. สถาบัน สุ ขภาพสัตว์แห่งชาติ กรมปศุสัตว์. 2552.
Barroso, G. P., C. P. R. Rodriguez, B. G. Extremera, M. A. Maldonado, G. G. Huertas and M. A. Salguero, 2002. Study of 1,595 brucellosis cases in the Almeria province (1972-1998) based on epidemiological data from disease reporting. Rev. Clin. Espanola, 202: 577-582.
มนยา เอกทัตร์. โรคบรูเซลโลสิสและการชันสูตรในประเทศไทย. สถาบันสุขภาพสัตว์แห่งชาติ กรมปศุสัตว์. 2537.
Hussein, A. A. A., A. S. M. Sayed and M. A. El Feki, 2005. Seroepidemiological study on human brucellosis in Assiut Governorate. Egypt. J. Immumol; 12: 49-56.
Kazi, M., R. Amin, M. B. Rahman, M. S. Rahman, J. Han, J. Park and J. Chae, 2005. Prevalence of Brucella antibodies in sera of cows in Bangladesh. J. Vet. Sci; 6: 223–6.
OIE, 2009. Bovine Brucellosis: Brucella abortus. [cited 20 March 2012]. Available from: http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/DiseaseInfo/animal-diseaseindex.php
Tzaneva, V., Ivanova, S., Georgieva, M., Tasheva, E. 2009. Investigation of the spread of brucellosis among human and animal population in southern Bulgaria. Eurosurveillance 14: 17 (30).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Responsibility and Copyright
1. Author Responsibility and Editorial Disagreement
The content and data in all articles published in WESR are the direct opinions and responsibility of the article authors, and the Journal's Editorial Board is not necessarily in agreement with, or jointly responsible for, them.
2. Copyright and Referencing
All articles, data, content, figures, etc., published in WESR are considered the copyright of the academic journal. If any individual or entity wishes to disseminate all or any part of the published material, appropriate citation of the article is required.

