Reliability and validity of the Thai version of the genital appearance satisfaction questionnaire
Keywords:
Genital appearance satisfaction, questionnaire, ThaiAbstract
Background: The genital appearance satisfaction (GAS) questionnaire was constructed to measure women’s feelings toward their own genitals in a broader spectrum. The Thai language GAS questionnaire is valuable for clinical and research purposes.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the GAS questionnaire.
Methods: For this study, 90 Thai women attending the gynecologic outpatient clinic at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between July 2017 and June 2018 were recruited. Ten participants dropped out because they did not answer the second questionnaire. The original English version of the GAS questionnaire was translated into the Thai version and backward translated by another linguist. The questionnaire content was then validated by two urogynecologists. After informed consent was obtained, the participants were asked to complete the Thai version of the GAS questionnaire and the Thai version of the female sexual function index (FSFI) at their first visit and only the Thai version of the GAS questionnaire at a 2-week interval (sent back by mail).
Results: The average age of the participants was 33.9 ± 7.0 years. The mean Thai version of the GAS questionnaire total scores at week 0 and week 2 were 6.0 ± 3.0 and 6.4 ± 2.8, respectively. The total score’s internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) was 0.9, and the intraclass correlation coefficient of the total score was 0.9 (0.8, 0.9).
Conclusion: We found that the Thai version of the GAS questionnaire is reliable and valid. It can be used to evaluate the satisfaction of genitalia in Thai women.
Downloads
References
Heidekrueger PI, Juran S, Ehrl D, Aung T, Tanna N, Broer PN. Global aesthetic surgery statistics: a closer look. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2017;51:270-4.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2016.1248842
Shaw D, Allen L, Chan C, Kives S, Popadiuk C, Robertson D, et al. Guideline No. 423: Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery and Procedures. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2022;44:204-14.e1.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2021.11.001
Thomson DR, Thomson NEV, Southwick G. Screening for body dysmorphic disorder in plastic surgery patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024;48:2738-43.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-03959-6
Sweis IE, Spitz J, Barry DR Jr, Cohen M. A review of body dysmorphic disorder in aesthetic surgery patients and the legal implications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2017;41:949-54.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0819-x
Vahia VN. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5: A quick glance. Indian J Psychiatry 2013;55:220-3.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.117131
Bramwell R, Morland C. Genital appearance satisfaction in women: The development of a questionnaire and exploration of correlates. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2009;27:15-27.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830701759793
Jansuwan A, Bunyavejchevin S, Ruanphoo P. Reliability and validity of Thai-version of female genital self-image scale (FGSIS) questionnaire. Thai J Obstet Gynecol 2022:30:272-8.
Rosen RC, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston CM, Shabsigh R, et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Therapy 2000:26;191-208.
https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597
Oranratanaphan S, Taneepanichskul S. A double blind randomized control trial, comparing effect of drospirenone and gestodene to sexual desire and libido. J Med Assoc Thai 2006 ;89 Suppl 4:S17-22.
Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2009. 11. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med 2002;21:1331-5.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1108
Veale D, Eshkevari E, Ellison N, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Kavouni A. Validation of genital appearance satisfaction scale and the cosmetic procedure screening scale for women seeking labiaplasty. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2013;34:46-52.
https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2012.756865
Al-Jumah MM, Al-Wailiy SK, Al-Badr A. Satisfaction survey of women after cosmetic genital procedures: a cross-sectional study from saudi arabia. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum 2020:10;3:ojaa048.
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaa048
Alavi-Arjas F, Goodman MP, Simbar M, Majd HA, Sharp G, Nahidi F. The effect of female genital cosmetic and reconstructive procedures on body and genital self-image: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Surg J 2023;43:1161-73.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Chulalongkorn Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.