Evaluation of pulmonary tuberculosis surveillance system at Bang Pakong hospital, Bang Pakong district, Chachoengsao province, fiscal year 2021–2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59096/wesr.v54i41.1273Keywords:
evaluation, surveillance system, pulmonary tuberculosis, ChachoengsaoAbstract
Introduction: Pulmonary tuberculosis is a significant contagious disease and a global public health problem, ranking fifth in the highest morbidity rate of communicable diseases in Bang Pakong District, with a mortality rate of 16.22% in 2022. In the fiscal year 2021–2022, data from the HosXP program reported 133 pulmonary TB cases, while 89 cases were enrolled in the National Tuberculosis Information Program (NTIP) program. Almost two-fold difference was observed between these databases. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the pulmonary tuberculosis surveillance system at Bang Pakong Hospital, Chachoengsao Province, in terms of both quantitative and qualitative characteristics.
Methods: A cross–sectional study was conducted to evaluate tuberculosis surveillance at Bang Pakong Hospital from October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022. The quantitative data were collected from outpatient and inpatient records, sputum findings, records from patients receiving rifampicin, and the NTIP report. Additionally, eighteen health personnel involved in the surveillance system were interviewed to determine qualitative attributes of the surveillance system. Both quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; percentage, median, mean, minimum, and maximum.
Results: The patients records of Bang Pakong Hospital from October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2022 reported 1,940 patients, were reviewed in this study. They were 133 patients from TB codes, and 1,807 patients from non–TB codes. Among these cases, 102 patients were included as TB cases based on the definition, 78 cases were from TB codes, and 24 were from non-TB codes. The NTIP report identified 89 cases according to the definition. The sensitivity of surveillance system was 87.25% and the positive predictive value (PVP) was 100%. Thirteen patients, who were not reported to the NTIP program, include AIDS patients treated in the ARV clinic and patients who requested treatment in other provinces according to their universal coverage scheme and social security scheme. The accuracy of variables in the report, including the accuracy of the date of registration, address, age, name-surname-gender, and timeliness was 88.76%, 89.89%, 98.88%, 100%, and 97.75%, respectively. In terms of representation, the data of both systems were similar and can be representation. The health personnel agreed that the TB surveillance system was useful, acceptable, and stable. However, the system is needed to be adjusted in terms of difficulty as the input data comprise of many pages. Moreover, the data must be reported to multiple programs.
Conclusions: The pulmonary tuberculosis surveillance system of Bang Pakong Hospital, Chachoengsao Province has high sensitivity, high positive predictive value, high accuracy, and can be representation. The qualitative data showed that the system was acceptable, useful, and stable. However, patients’ data from HosXP program should be verified before importing it into NTIP program to ensure data completeness and enhance sensitivity.
References
World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
Division of Tuberculosis, Department of Disease Control Thailand. National tuberculosis control programme guideline, Thailand 2021. Bangkok: Division of Tuberculosis; 2021. (in Thai)
Division of Tuberculosis, Department of Disease Control Thailand. National Tuberculosis Information Program [internet]. [cited 2023 Jun 20]. Available from https://ntip-ddc.moph.go.th/Downloads/UserManualNTIP19_10_20.pdf (in Thai)
Bangpakong Hospital, Chachoengsao Province Thailand. Information of tuberculosis patients in the Bangpakong Hospital, fiscal year 2020–2022. Chachoengsao: Chachoengsao Province Public Health Office; 2022. (in Thai)
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control Thailand. Case definition for communicable diseases surveillance, Thailand, 2020. Nonthaburi: Division of Epidemiology; 2020. (in Thai)
Rungruang C, Wongprasert P. Pulmonary tuberculosis surveillance evaluation at Klongluang Hospital, Pathum Thani Province, Thailand, Fiscal year 2017. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report. 2019; 50: 457–63. (in Thai)
Wijitsetthakul S, Lengthong W. Evaluation of pulmonary tuberculosis surveillance system in adult patients aged 15–year–old up at Ratchaburi Hospital, Ratchaburi Province, Thailand, since October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2018. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report. 2019; 50: 82–8. (in Thai)
Pawasuttikul C, Patanasakpinyo C, Subsin K. Evaluation of pulmonary tuberculosis surveillance system in healthcare personnel Sawanpracharak Hospital. Region 3 Medical and Public Health Journal. 2021; 18: 248–60.
Utaipiboon S, Kijcharoensap J. Evaluation of information systems and epidemiology of tuberculosis patients Chiang Kham Hospital, Phayao Province, Fiscal year 2001. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report. 2003; 34: 693–9. (in Thai)
Boonpradit P, Ketmanee A. Pulmonary tuberculosis surveillance evaluation at Ratchaburi Hospital, Ratchaburi Province, Thailand, Fiscal year 2013. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report. 2015; 46: S68–75. (in Thai)
Polachom T, Kawkean S. Tuberculosis surveillance evaluation at Kusuman Hospital, Sakon Nakhon Province, Thailand, Fiscal year 2017. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report. 2019; 50: 429–37. (in Thai)
Puedkuntod P, Malatong P. Evaluation of tuberculosis surveillance at the border area of Buriram Province, Thailand, 2018. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report. 2019; 50: 701–9. (in Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. เนื้อหาและข้อมูลในบทความที่ลงพิมพ์กับ WESR ถือเป็นข้อคิดเห็น และความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความโดยตรงซึ่งกองบรรณาธิการวารสารไม่จำเป็นต้องเห็นด้วย หรือร่วมรับผิดชอบใด ๆ
2. บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ใน WESR ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสารวิชาการ หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่ง ส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่ กรุณาอ้างอิงบทความนั้น ๆ