Can outbreak signal of the Bureau of Epidemiology really detect aberration?: A case study of typhoid fever, 2009 - 2013

Authors

  • Panithee Thammawijaya Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health

Keywords:

outbreak detection, signal, surveillance, typhoid fever

Abstract

Early outbreak detection is one of important functions of epidemiological surveillance which can initiate timely and efficient control measures. Several statistical methods that support this surveillance function are currently available. This study aimed to assess attributes of outbreak signal system of the Bureau of Epidemiology (BOE), adapted from a method developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and typhoid fever was chosen as a case study. Weekly number of typhoid fever reported in national notifiable disease reporting system was analyzed to identify signals and aberrations occurred during 2009-2013. In this study, 44 abnormal weeks, which were grouped into 10 abnormal events, were identified. At the signal threshold level of 1 standard deviation (SD), sensitivity of detecting abnormal weeks and abnormal events were 43% and 40% respectively whereas those of the signal level of 2 SD were 25% and 30% respectively. For both signal threshold levels, positive predictive values were 100% and median delayed signal times were one week after abnormal events. These findings suggested that sensitivity of the BOE signal system should be increased, either by reducing threshold level or using other alternative outbreak detection methods.

References

Lee LM, Teutsch SM, Thacker SB. Principles and Practice of Public Health Surveillance. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

Farrington P, Andrews N. Outbreak Detection: Applications to Infectious Disease Surveillance. In: Brookmeyer R, Stroup DF, editors. Monitoring the Health of Populations: Statistical Principles and Methods for Public Health Surveillance. 1sted. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

Shmueli G, H Burkom. Statistical Challenges Facing Early Outbreak Detection in Biosurveillance. Technometrics 2010; 52: 39-51.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: Changes in Notifiable Disease Surveillance Data-- United States, 1992-1993. MMWR 1993; 42: 824-47.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Current Trends Proposed Changes in Format for Presentation of Notifiable Disease Report Data. MMWR 1989; 38: 805-9.

ลดารัตน์ ผาตินาวิน, จีระสิทธิ์ ศรีสุโพธิ์, เฉวตสรร นามวาท (ออนไลน์). การปรับเปลี่ยนรูปแบบการนําเสนอข้อมูลการ เฝ้าระวังโรค. 2557 [สืบค้นวันที่ 21 พฤษภาคม 2557]. เข้าถึง ได้จาก http://www.boe.moph.go.th/files/outbreak_det ection_readme[1].pdf

Heymann DL, editor. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. 19th ed. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2008.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems. MMWR 2001; 50 (RR13): 1-35.

Fienberg SE, Shmueli G. Statistical issues and challenges associated with rapid detection of bioterrorist attacks. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24: 513-29.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-12

How to Cite

Thammawijaya, P. (2024). Can outbreak signal of the Bureau of Epidemiology really detect aberration?: A case study of typhoid fever, 2009 - 2013. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report, 45(16), 241–248. retrieved from https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/WESR/article/view/3052

Issue

Section

Original article