Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Efficacy: Jones Procedure versus Combined Jones-Hotz Technique in the Management of Involutional Entropion

Authors

  • Watcharasak ่Jara Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sakon Nakhon Hospital

Keywords:

Jones retractor plication, Hotz procedure, Involutional entropion, Recurrence rate, Comparative surgical outcomes, Operative efficacy

Abstract

          Background: Involutional entropion represents a prevalent ophthalmic disorder in Asian populations, particularly amid the demographic transition toward aging societies. The condition significantly impairs patients' quality of life through ocular discomfort and visual disturbances. Age-related attenuation and laxity of the capsulopalpebral fascia (CPF) fundamentally limits the efficacy of isolated Jones retractor plication, necessitating supplementary surgical interventions. This study evaluates the comparative effectiveness of the Jones procedure alone versus a combined Jones-Hotz approach in entropion correction.

            Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted examining patients who underwent lower eyelid entropion repair between January 2015 and December 2023. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon. The study comprised 88 eyelids divided into two groups: Group A (n=47) underwent Jones retractor plication exclusively, while Group B (n=41) received combined Jones retractor plication with modified Hotz procedure. Inclusion criteria specified involutional entropion without horizontal eyelid laxity and minimum six-month follow-up. Primary outcome measure was recurrence rate; secondary outcome was operative duration.

            Results: Demographic characteristics demonstrated no statistically significant intergroup differences (mean age 70.6 years, range 61-92; male predominance 72%). Complete correction of ciliary orientation was achieved in all patients with universal patient satisfaction. Group A demonstrated a recurrence rate of 19.15% (9/47 cases) with mean operative time of 30.6 minutes. Group B exhibited significantly superior outcomes with a recurrence rate of 4.65% (2/41 cases; p<0.05, Fisher's exact test) and mean operative time of 41.4 minutes. The odds ratio of 0.21 indicated Group B patients had approximately 4.76-fold lower recurrence odds compared to Group A. One case of mild, self-resolving ectropion occurred in Group B.

            Conclusions: The combined Jones-Hotz procedure demonstrates statistically significant superiority over isolated Jones retractor plication in treating involutional entropion without horizontal laxity, reducing recurrence rates from 19% to 5%. The incremental operative time of 10.8 minutes represents a clinically acceptable trade-off for substantially improved long-term outcomes. This combined approach addresses multiple pathophysiological factors—specifically CPF dehiscence and preseptal orbicularis override—thereby providing comprehensive anatomical correction. These findings support adoption of the combined technique as the preferred surgical intervention for involutional entropion in appropriate candidates.

Author Biography

Watcharasak ่Jara, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Sakon Nakhon Hospital

นายแพทย์เชี่ยวชาญ ภาควิชาศัลยกรรมพลาสติกและตกแต่ง โรงพยาบาลสกลนคร

References

Nishimoto H, Takahashi Y, Kakizaki H. Relationship of horizontal lower eyelid laxity, involutional entropion occurrence, and age of Asian patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;29(6):492–496.

Carter SR, Chang J, Aguilar GL, Rathbun JE, Seiff SR. Involutional entropion and ectropion of the Asian lower eyelid. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;16(1):45–49

Marcet MM, Phelps PO, Lai JS. Involutional entropion: risk factors and surgical remedies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015;26(5):416–421

Smith HB, Jyothi SB, Mahroo OA, Shams PN, Sira M, Dey S, et al. Patient-reported benefit from occuloplastic surgery. Eye (Lond) 2012;26(11):1418–1423.

Lin P, Kitaguchi Y, Mupas-Uy J, Sabundayo MS, Takahashi Y, Kakizaki H. Involutional lower eyelid entropion: causative factors and therapeutic management. Int Ophthalmol 2019;39(8):1895–1907.

Bashour M, Harvey J. Causes of involutional ectropion and entropion--age-related tarsal changes are the key. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;16(2):131-41.

Steel DH, Hoh HB, Harrad RA, Collins CR. Botulinum toxin for the temporary treatment of involutional lower lid entropion: a clinical and morphological study. Eye (Lond) 1997;11(Pt 4):472-5.

Deka A, Saikia SP. Botulinum toxin for lower lid entropion correction. Orbit 2011;30:40–2.

Miletic D, Elabjer BK, Bušić M, Tvrdi AB, Petrović Z, Bjeloš M. Histopathological changes in involutional lower eyelid entropion: the tarsus is thickened!. Can J Opthalmol 2016;51(6):482-486

Scheepers MA, Singh R, Ng J, Zuercher D, Gibson A, Bunce C, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing everting sutures with everting sutures and a lateral tarsal strip for involutional entropion. Ophthalmology 2010;117(2):352-5.

Barnes JA, Bunce C, Olver JM. Simple effective surgery for involutional entropion suitable for the general ophthalmologist. Ophthalmology 2006;113(1):92-6.

Boboridis K, Bunce C, Rose GE. A comparative study of two procedures for repair of involutional lower lid entropi-on. Ophthalmology 2000;107(5):959-61.

Rougraff PM, Tse DT, Johnson TE, Feuer W. Involutional entropion repair with fornix sutures and lateral tarsal strip procedure. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;17(4):281-7.

Yip CC, Choo CT. The correction of oriental lower lid involutional entropion using the combined procedure. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2000;29(4):463-6.

Dryden RM, Leibsohn J, Wobig J. Senile entropion. Pathogenesis and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96(10):1883-5.

Iliff NT. An easy approach to entropion surgery. Ann Ophthalmol 1976;8(11):1343-6.

Hedin A. Senile entropion: cure rate by retractor tightening and horizontal shortening. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75(4):443-6.

Wesley RE, Collins JW. Combined procedure for senile entropion. Ophthalmic Surg 1983;14(5):4015.

Allen LH. Four-snip procedure for involutional lower lid entropion: modification of Quickert and Jones procedures. Can J Ophthalmol 1991;26(3):139-43.

Carroll RP, Allen SE. Combined procedure for repair of involutional entropion. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;7(2):123-7.

Athavale DD, O’donnell BA. Lower eyelid entropion repair with retractor mobilization and insertion onto the anterior surface of thetarsal plate. Orbit 2018;37(2):121-4.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

1.
่Jara W. Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Efficacy: Jones Procedure versus Combined Jones-Hotz Technique in the Management of Involutional Entropion . Med J Sakon Nakhon Hosp [internet]. 2025 Dec. 29 [cited 2026 Jan. 11];28(3):89-102. available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSakonNakHosp/article/view/7066

Issue

Section

Original article