Evaluation of the dengue infection surveillance system in Sawanpracharak Hospital, Nakhon Sawan province, Thailand, January 2023 to November 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59096/wesr.v57i2.6927Keywords:
surveillance evaluation, dengue infection, Sawanpracharak Hospital,, Nakhon Sawan ProvinceAbstract
Background: Dengue infection remains a major public health concern both nationally and in Nakhon Sawan Province, as it can manifest in varying degrees of clinical severity. According to epidemiological surveillance data, the morbidity rate in Mueang Nakhon Sawan District in 2024 showed a decreasing trend compared to 2023 but remained higher than the five-year median. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the dengue surveillance system at Sawanpracharak Hospital by describing its operational processes, assessing both quantitative and qualitative attributes, and providing recommendations for system improvement
Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 797 patients diagnosed with dengue infection or dengue-like illnesses who received care at Sawanpracharak Hospital between January 1, 2023 and November 30, 2024. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling. Medical records were reviewed and analyzed quantitatively, while qualitative attributes were explored through in-depth interviews with 19 staff members involved in the surveillance system.
Results: The weighted sensitivity of the dengue surveillance system at Sawanpracharak Hospital was 58.4%, with a positive predictive value of 99.02%. The timeliness of reports within seven days was 97.9% in 2023 and 98.2% in 2024. Data completeness reached 100% in both years, while data accuracy for variables such as sex, age, nationality, onset date, and diagnosis date exceeded 90%. The representativeness of the system was high, as the characteristics of reported cases closely aligned with those in the hospital database, indicating good consistency and coverage of case reporting. However, accuracy for the “sub-district of residence” variable was relatively lower. The system demonstrated good levels of acceptability, flexibility, and stability, although some difficulties were noted regarding the simplicity of the reporting process.
Conclusions: The quantitative attributes of the dengue surveillance system including sensitivity, positive predictive value, representativeness, timeliness, and data quality were found to be generally good. Qualitatively, the system exhibited good acceptability, flexibility, and stability; however, simplicity remained an area for improvement to enhance overall surveillance efficiency.
References
Ministry of Public Health (TH), Department of Medical Services. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of dengue patients (abridged version), 2023. Nonthaburi: Department of Medical Services; 2023. (in Thai)
Ministry of Public Health (TH), Department of Disease Control, Division of Epidemiology. Digital 506: epidemiological surveillance report [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 28]. Available from: https://d506portal.ddc.moph.go.th/web-portal (in Thai)
Ministry of Public Health (TH), Department of Disease Control, Division of Epidemiology. Epidemiological surveillance work [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 28]. Available from: http://203.157.114.24 (in Thai)
Ministry of Public Health (TH), Department of Disease Control, Division of Epidemiology. Definitions of communicable diseases and guidelines for reporting dangerous and under-surveillance diseases in Thailand. Nonthaburi: Bureau of Epidemiology; 2020. (in Thai)
Ongate P, Tantisantisom H. An evaluation of dengue surveillance in muang district, Kamphaengphet province, Thailand, 2013. Wkly Epidemiol. Surveill. Rep. [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Nov 13];46(S1):S30–2. Available from: https://he05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/WESR/article/view/1831 (in Thai)
Thitichai P. Surveillance evaluation. Lecture notes for the Course on Field Epidemiology and Management Training 2024; 2024 Nov 25–29; TK Palace Hotel & Convention, Bangkok. (in Thai)
Communicable Disease Act B.E. 2558 (2015). Given on 10 August 2015. Royal Gazette. 2015 Sep 8;132(86 G):26–44. (in Thai)
Ministry of Public Health (TH), Department of Disease Control, Division of Epidemiology. Standards and operational guidelines for disease surveillance, investigation, and response teams, 2020. Nonthaburi: Division of Epidemiology; 2020. (in Thai)
World Health Organization. Dengue: guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009 [cited 2024 Nov 28]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/b1db05d8-0e97-469e-b529-464dca6de540/content
Thongdeepan M. Relationship between workload and staffing integration with nursing quality. Nursing Research [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Nov 28]:22–6. Available from: http://www.medi.co.th/hotnews11/nursing_1625473578NR124.pdf (in Thai)
Lakwang P, Sukravejsiri P. Quality of dengue hemorrhagic fever patient reporting in government hospitals, Yasothon province. KKU J Public Health Res [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Nov 17];5(2):55–64. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kkujphr/article/view/118173 (in Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Responsibility and Copyright
1. Author Responsibility and Editorial Disagreement
The content and data in all articles published in WESR are the direct opinions and responsibility of the article authors, and the Journal's Editorial Board is not necessarily in agreement with, or jointly responsible for, them.
2. Copyright and Referencing
All articles, data, content, figures, etc., published in WESR are considered the copyright of the academic journal. If any individual or entity wishes to disseminate all or any part of the published material, appropriate citation of the article is required.

